Re: ioctl's suck?

[Brian Beattie <beattie@beattie-home.net>]

On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 13:56 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I could add a control device and pass ascii strings for status and OOB
> > messages, would that be an improvement?
> 
> Usually not. The idea that ioctl can be replaced with ascii messages is
> clueless rubbish that generally gets spouted by people with their head
> in the clouds of conceptual elegance and no grasp of reality.

Yeah, I can see that.  Though the case has been made that ioctls are
only usable by C/C++ while I'm sure there are other languages, I'm
working in the embedded space and mostly work with C and sh so my
experience is limited and that is of less direct importance to me.

> 
> There are certain things you can expose that way usefully via sysfs
> - things like general stateless status information. Ioctl however provides
> an interface tied to file handle not name (which is essential in a hotplug
> environment) and an ordering to events so you know the response you get
> matches the query you made.

Yeah coherence (if I'm using that word correctly) would be critical, and
a separate file handle would make that tricky.


> Alan
-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing?

Brian Beattie   LFS12947 | "Honor isn't about making the right choices.
beattie@beattie-home.net | It's about dealing with the consequences."
www.beattie-home.net     | -- Midori Koto