From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:26:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217831167.9016.41.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080804055339.GB5444@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 11:23 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> Peter, vatsa, any ideas?
---
Patches in tip/sched/clock
---
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 5270d44..ea436bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1572,28 +1572,13 @@ static inline void sched_clock_idle_sleep_event(void)
static inline void sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(u64 delta_ns)
{
}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
-static inline void sched_clock_tick_stop(int cpu)
-{
-}
-
-static inline void sched_clock_tick_start(int cpu)
-{
-}
-#endif
-
-#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK */
+#else
extern void sched_clock_init(void);
extern u64 sched_clock_cpu(int cpu);
extern void sched_clock_tick(void);
extern void sched_clock_idle_sleep_event(void);
extern void sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(u64 delta_ns);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
-extern void sched_clock_tick_stop(int cpu);
-extern void sched_clock_tick_start(int cpu);
#endif
-#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK */
/*
* For kernel-internal use: high-speed (but slightly incorrect) per-cpu
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.hz b/kernel/Kconfig.hz
index 382dd5a..94fabd5 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.hz
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.hz
@@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ config HZ
default 1000 if HZ_1000
config SCHED_HRTICK
- def_bool HIGH_RES_TIMERS && USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
+ def_bool HIGH_RES_TIMERS && (!SMP || USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 21f7da9..9a76e92 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static inline u64 global_rt_period(void)
static inline u64 global_rt_runtime(void)
{
- if (sysctl_sched_rt_period < 0)
+ if (sysctl_sched_rt_runtime < 0)
return RUNTIME_INF;
return (u64)sysctl_sched_rt_runtime * NSEC_PER_USEC;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_clock.c b/kernel/sched_clock.c
index 22ed55d..074edc9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_clock.c
@@ -32,14 +32,18 @@
#include <linux/ktime.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+/*
+ * Scheduler clock - returns current time in nanosec units.
+ * This is default implementation.
+ * Architectures and sub-architectures can override this.
+ */
+unsigned long long __attribute__((weak)) sched_clock(void)
+{
+ return (unsigned long long)jiffies * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
+}
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
-#define MULTI_SHIFT 15
-/* Max is double, Min is 1/2 */
-#define MAX_MULTI (2LL << MULTI_SHIFT)
-#define MIN_MULTI (1LL << (MULTI_SHIFT-1))
-
struct sched_clock_data {
/*
* Raw spinlock - this is a special case: this might be called
@@ -49,14 +53,9 @@ struct sched_clock_data {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
unsigned long tick_jiffies;
- u64 prev_raw;
u64 tick_raw;
u64 tick_gtod;
u64 clock;
- s64 multi;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
- int check_max;
-#endif
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct sched_clock_data, sched_clock_data);
@@ -84,90 +83,39 @@ void sched_clock_init(void)
scd->lock = (raw_spinlock_t)__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
scd->tick_jiffies = now_jiffies;
- scd->prev_raw = 0;
scd->tick_raw = 0;
scd->tick_gtod = ktime_now;
scd->clock = ktime_now;
- scd->multi = 1 << MULTI_SHIFT;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
- scd->check_max = 1;
-#endif
}
sched_clock_running = 1;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
-/*
- * The dynamic ticks makes the delta jiffies inaccurate. This
- * prevents us from checking the maximum time update.
- * Disable the maximum check during stopped ticks.
- */
-void sched_clock_tick_stop(int cpu)
-{
- struct sched_clock_data *scd = cpu_sdc(cpu);
-
- scd->check_max = 0;
-}
-
-void sched_clock_tick_start(int cpu)
-{
- struct sched_clock_data *scd = cpu_sdc(cpu);
-
- scd->check_max = 1;
-}
-
-static int check_max(struct sched_clock_data *scd)
-{
- return scd->check_max;
-}
-#else
-static int check_max(struct sched_clock_data *scd)
-{
- return 1;
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */
-
/*
* update the percpu scd from the raw @now value
*
* - filter out backward motion
* - use jiffies to generate a min,max window to clip the raw values
*/
-static void __update_sched_clock(struct sched_clock_data *scd, u64 now, u64 *time)
+static u64 __update_sched_clock(struct sched_clock_data *scd, u64 now)
{
unsigned long now_jiffies = jiffies;
long delta_jiffies = now_jiffies - scd->tick_jiffies;
u64 clock = scd->clock;
u64 min_clock, max_clock;
- s64 delta = now - scd->prev_raw;
+ s64 delta = now - scd->tick_raw;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
-
- /*
- * At schedule tick the clock can be just under the gtod. We don't
- * want to push it too prematurely.
- */
- min_clock = scd->tick_gtod + (delta_jiffies * TICK_NSEC);
- if (min_clock > TICK_NSEC)
- min_clock -= TICK_NSEC / 2;
+ min_clock = scd->tick_gtod + delta_jiffies * TICK_NSEC;
if (unlikely(delta < 0)) {
clock++;
goto out;
}
- /*
- * The clock must stay within a jiffie of the gtod.
- * But since we may be at the start of a jiffy or the end of one
- * we add another jiffy buffer.
- */
- max_clock = scd->tick_gtod + (2 + delta_jiffies) * TICK_NSEC;
-
- delta *= scd->multi;
- delta >>= MULTI_SHIFT;
+ max_clock = min_clock + TICK_NSEC;
- if (unlikely(clock + delta > max_clock) && check_max(scd)) {
+ if (unlikely(clock + delta > max_clock)) {
if (clock < max_clock)
clock = max_clock;
else
@@ -180,12 +128,10 @@ static void __update_sched_clock(struct sched_clock_data *scd, u64 now, u64 *tim
if (unlikely(clock < min_clock))
clock = min_clock;
- if (time)
- *time = clock;
- else {
- scd->prev_raw = now;
- scd->clock = clock;
- }
+ scd->tick_jiffies = now_jiffies;
+ scd->clock = clock;
+
+ return clock;
}
static void lock_double_clock(struct sched_clock_data *data1,
@@ -203,7 +149,7 @@ static void lock_double_clock(struct sched_clock_data *data1,
u64 sched_clock_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct sched_clock_data *scd = cpu_sdc(cpu);
- u64 now, clock;
+ u64 now, clock, this_clock, remote_clock;
if (unlikely(!sched_clock_running))
return 0ull;
@@ -212,43 +158,44 @@ u64 sched_clock_cpu(int cpu)
now = sched_clock();
if (cpu != raw_smp_processor_id()) {
- /*
- * in order to update a remote cpu's clock based on our
- * unstable raw time rebase it against:
- * tick_raw (offset between raw counters)
- * tick_gotd (tick offset between cpus)
- */
struct sched_clock_data *my_scd = this_scd();
lock_double_clock(scd, my_scd);
- now -= my_scd->tick_raw;
- now += scd->tick_raw;
+ this_clock = __update_sched_clock(my_scd, now);
+ remote_clock = scd->clock;
- now += my_scd->tick_gtod;
- now -= scd->tick_gtod;
+ /*
+ * Use the opportunity that we have both locks
+ * taken to couple the two clocks: we take the
+ * larger time as the latest time for both
+ * runqueues. (this creates monotonic movement)
+ */
+ if (likely(remote_clock < this_clock)) {
+ clock = this_clock;
+ scd->clock = clock;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Should be rare, but possible:
+ */
+ clock = remote_clock;
+ my_scd->clock = remote_clock;
+ }
__raw_spin_unlock(&my_scd->lock);
-
- __update_sched_clock(scd, now, &clock);
-
- __raw_spin_unlock(&scd->lock);
-
} else {
__raw_spin_lock(&scd->lock);
- __update_sched_clock(scd, now, NULL);
- clock = scd->clock;
- __raw_spin_unlock(&scd->lock);
+ clock = __update_sched_clock(scd, now);
}
+ __raw_spin_unlock(&scd->lock);
+
return clock;
}
void sched_clock_tick(void)
{
struct sched_clock_data *scd = this_scd();
- unsigned long now_jiffies = jiffies;
- s64 mult, delta_gtod, delta_raw;
u64 now, now_gtod;
if (unlikely(!sched_clock_running))
@@ -260,29 +207,14 @@ void sched_clock_tick(void)
now = sched_clock();
__raw_spin_lock(&scd->lock);
- __update_sched_clock(scd, now, NULL);
+ __update_sched_clock(scd, now);
/*
* update tick_gtod after __update_sched_clock() because that will
* already observe 1 new jiffy; adding a new tick_gtod to that would
* increase the clock 2 jiffies.
*/
- delta_gtod = now_gtod - scd->tick_gtod;
- delta_raw = now - scd->tick_raw;
-
- if ((long)delta_raw > 0) {
- mult = delta_gtod << MULTI_SHIFT;
- do_div(mult, delta_raw);
- scd->multi = mult;
- if (scd->multi > MAX_MULTI)
- scd->multi = MAX_MULTI;
- else if (scd->multi < MIN_MULTI)
- scd->multi = MIN_MULTI;
- } else
- scd->multi = 1 << MULTI_SHIFT;
-
scd->tick_raw = now;
scd->tick_gtod = now_gtod;
- scd->tick_jiffies = now_jiffies;
__raw_spin_unlock(&scd->lock);
}
@@ -301,7 +233,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_clock_idle_sleep_event);
void sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(u64 delta_ns)
{
struct sched_clock_data *scd = this_scd();
- u64 now = sched_clock();
/*
* Override the previous timestamp and ignore all
@@ -310,9 +241,7 @@ void sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(u64 delta_ns)
* rq clock:
*/
__raw_spin_lock(&scd->lock);
- scd->prev_raw = now;
scd->clock += delta_ns;
- scd->multi = 1 << MULTI_SHIFT;
__raw_spin_unlock(&scd->lock);
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
@@ -321,16 +250,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event);
#endif
-/*
- * Scheduler clock - returns current time in nanosec units.
- * This is default implementation.
- * Architectures and sub-architectures can override this.
- */
-unsigned long long __attribute__((weak)) sched_clock(void)
-{
- return (unsigned long long)jiffies * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
-}
-
unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
{
unsigned long long clock;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index cf2cd6c..0fe94ea 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static void hrtick_start_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
* doesn't make sense. Rely on vruntime for fairness.
*/
if (rq->curr != p)
- delta = max(10000LL, delta);
+ delta = max_t(s64, 10000LL, delta);
hrtick_start(rq, delta);
}
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 825b4c0..f5da526 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
ts->tick_stopped = 1;
ts->idle_jiffies = last_jiffies;
rcu_enter_nohz();
- sched_clock_tick_stop(cpu);
}
/*
@@ -392,7 +391,6 @@ void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(void)
select_nohz_load_balancer(0);
now = ktime_get();
tick_do_update_jiffies64(now);
- sched_clock_tick_start(cpu);
cpu_clear(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-04 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-31 3:20 VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Zhang, Yanmin
2008-07-31 7:31 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-07-31 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-07-31 7:49 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-01 0:39 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-01 2:35 ` Miao Xie
2008-08-01 3:08 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-01 5:14 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-08-04 5:04 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-04 5:22 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-08-04 5:37 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-04 5:53 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-08-04 6:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-08-04 6:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-04 7:05 ` Dhaval Giani
2008-08-04 7:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2030-08-06 3:26 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-08 7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20080811185008.GA29291@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1912726331.25608.235.camel@ymzhang>
[not found] ` <20080817115035.GA32223@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20080818052155.GA5063@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2008-08-20 7:24 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-20 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-20 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-21 2:25 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-21 6:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-21 6:48 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-29 3:35 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-29 3:38 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-20 14:32 ` adobriyan
2008-08-20 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 15:10 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-20 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 16:29 ` Ray Lee
2008-08-20 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 17:55 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-20 18:15 ` Ray Lee
2008-08-20 20:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 20:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 6:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-08-21 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-20 20:58 ` Ray Lee
2008-08-20 21:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-21 6:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2030-08-13 8:50 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2008-08-04 6:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-15 15:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-01 12:25 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-08-04 0:54 ` Zhang, Yanmin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217831167.9016.41.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox