From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de,
"Andreas.Eversberg" <Andreas.Eversberg@versatel.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Fix remaining big endian issue of hfcmulti
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 07:45:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217972753.24157.204.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080805210239.GB6052@pingi.kke.suse.de>
> static void
> my_out32(struct card *c, u_int offset, u-int data)
> {
> if (c->mode == MMIO) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> or use 2 function, one for the MMIO and one for the PIO model and then use
> indirect calls (like c->my_out32(...)) ?
The former is more ugly but slightly faster on some archs.
Indirect function calls tend to be slightly slower than an if / else
statement that can be more easily predicted by the processor.
But in the case of IOs, it's not going to be a big deal, -especially- if
you use the _rep forms for data transfers (and thus don't do an indirect
call for each read/write). So it's totally up to you.
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-05 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-02 14:35 [PATCH 3/4] Fix remaining big endian issue of hfcmulti Karsten Keil
2008-08-04 12:03 ` David Woodhouse
2008-08-04 14:29 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-05 4:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 11:31 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-05 13:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 17:25 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-05 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-05 21:02 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-05 21:23 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-08-05 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-05 21:59 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-08-05 23:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 23:38 ` Sean MacLennan
2008-08-06 0:18 ` Karsten Keil
2008-08-06 0:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-05 21:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2008-08-05 21:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-07 11:01 AW: " Andreas.Eversberg
2008-08-07 13:46 ` Karsten Keil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217972753.24157.204.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=Andreas.Eversberg@versatel.de \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=kkeil@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox