public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao" <fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@valinux.co.jp>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, uchida@ap.jp.nec.com,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	agk@sourceware.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	ngupta@google.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com
Subject: Re: RFC: I/O bandwidth controller
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:48:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218037688.10907.85.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218004892.3950.12.camel@sebastian.kern.oss.ntt.co.jp>

On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 15:41 +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> > I agree with your plan.
> > We keep bio-cgroup improving and porting to the latest kernel.
> Having more users of bio-cgroup would probably help to get it merged, so
> we'll certainly send patches as soon as we get our cfq prototype in
> shape.

I'm confused.  Are these two of the competing controllers?  Or are the
complementary in some way?

-- Dave


  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-06 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-04  8:51 [PATCH 0/7] I/O bandwidth controller and BIO tracking Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-04  8:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] dm-ioband: Patch of device-mapper driver Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-04  8:52   ` [PATCH 2/7] dm-ioband: Documentation of design overview, installation, command reference and examples Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-04  8:57     ` [PATCH 3/7] bio-cgroup: Introduction Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-04  8:57       ` [PATCH 4/7] bio-cgroup: Split the cgroup memory subsystem into two parts Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-04  8:59         ` [PATCH 5/7] bio-cgroup: Remove a lot of ifdefs Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-04  9:00           ` [PATCH 6/7] bio-cgroup: Implement the bio-cgroup Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-04  9:01             ` [PATCH 7/7] bio-cgroup: Add a cgroup support to dm-ioband Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-08  7:10             ` [PATCH 6/7] bio-cgroup: Implement the bio-cgroup Takuya Yoshikawa
2008-08-08  8:30               ` Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-08  9:42                 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2008-08-08 11:41                   ` Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-05 10:25         ` [PATCH 4/7] bio-cgroup: Split the cgroup memory subsystem into two parts Andrea Righi
2008-08-05 10:35           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-06  7:54         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-06 11:43           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-06 13:45             ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-08-07  7:25               ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-07  8:21                 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-07  8:45                   ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-04 17:20 ` Too many I/O controller patches Dave Hansen
2008-08-04 18:22   ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-04 19:02     ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-04 20:44       ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-04 20:50         ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-05  6:28           ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-05  5:55         ` Paul Menage
2008-08-05  6:03           ` Balbir Singh
2008-08-05  9:27           ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-05 16:25           ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-05  6:16         ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-05  9:31           ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-05 10:01             ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-05  2:50     ` Satoshi UCHIDA
2008-08-05  9:28       ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-05 13:17         ` Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-05 16:20         ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-06  2:44           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-08-06  3:30             ` Balbir Singh
2008-08-06  6:48             ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-05 12:01       ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-04 18:34   ` Balbir Singh
2008-08-04 20:42     ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-06  1:13   ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller (was Re: Too many I/O controller patches) Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-06  6:18     ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-06  6:41       ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-06 15:48         ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2008-08-07  4:38           ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-06 16:42     ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller (was Re: Too many I/O controller patches) Balbir Singh
2008-08-06 18:00       ` Dave Hansen
2008-08-07  2:44       ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-07  3:01       ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-08 11:39         ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-12  5:35           ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-06 19:37     ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller (was Re: Too many I/O controller patches) Naveen Gupta
2008-08-07  8:30       ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-07 13:17       ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller (was Re: Too many I/O controller patches) Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-11 18:18         ` Naveen Gupta
2008-08-11 16:35           ` David Collier-Brown
2008-08-07  7:46     ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-07 13:59       ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-11 20:52         ` Andrea Righi
     [not found]           ` <loom.20080812T071504-212@post.gmane.org>
2008-08-12 11:10             ` RFC: I/O bandwidth controller Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-12 12:55               ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-12 13:07                 ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-12 13:54                   ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-12 15:03                     ` James.Smart
2008-08-12 21:00                       ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-12 20:44                     ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-13  7:47                       ` Dong-Jae Kang
2008-08-13 17:56                         ` Andrea Righi
2008-08-14 11:18                 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-08-12 13:15               ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-13  6:23               ` 강동재
2008-08-08  6:21     ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2008-08-08  7:20       ` Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-08  8:10         ` Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
2008-08-08 10:05           ` Ryo Tsuruta
2008-08-08 14:31       ` Hirokazu Takahashi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1218037688.10907.85.camel@nimitz \
    --to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agk@sourceware.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@google.com \
    --cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox