From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
marcin.slusarz@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:46:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1218203218.8625.114.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1218202249.8625.106.camel@twins>
/me tatoos on forehead: 'quilt refresh' before posting!!
On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 15:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 11:57 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:15:47 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > How about I use the lockdep infrastructure to check if printk() is
> > > invoked whole holding either xtime or rq lock, and then avoid calling
> > > wake_up_klogd(). That way, we at least get sane debug output when the
> > > lock debugging infrastructure is enabled?
> >
> > The core problem seems to be that printk shouldn't be calling wake_up().
> > Can we fix that?
> >
> > I expect it would be acceptable to do it from the timer interrupt instead.
> > For NOHZ kernels a poll when we enter the idle loop would also be needed.
>
> Something along the lines of the below patch?
>
> > But does that cover everything? Is it possible for a CPU to run 100% busy
> > while not receiving timer interrupts? I guess so. To receive no
> > interrupts at all? Also possible.
>
> local_irq_disable(); while (1);
>
> But I guess you have more pressing issues when that happens..
>
> ---
Subject: printk: robustify printk wakeup behaviour
The klogd wakeup in the printk patch can cause deadlocks when holding the
rq->lock and or xtime_lock for writing.
Avoid doing the wakeup under certain conditions and delay it to the next jiffy
tick.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 4 +++
include/linux/seqlock.h | 5 ++++
kernel/printk.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 -
kernel/timer.c | 1
5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ extern struct ratelimit_state printk_rat
extern int printk_ratelimit(void);
extern bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies,
unsigned int interval_msec);
+extern void printk_tick(void);
+extern int printk_needs_cpu(int);
#else
static inline int vprintk(const char *s, va_list args)
__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 0)));
@@ -211,6 +213,8 @@ static inline int printk_ratelimit(void)
static inline bool printk_timed_ratelimit(unsigned long *caller_jiffies, \
unsigned int interval_msec) \
{ return false; }
+static inline void printk_tick(void) { }
+static inline int printk_needs_cpu(int) { return 0; }
#endif
extern void asmlinkage __attribute__((format(printf, 1, 2)))
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/seqlock.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/seqlock.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/seqlock.h
@@ -71,6 +71,11 @@ static inline void write_sequnlock(seqlo
spin_unlock(&sl->lock);
}
+static inline int seq_is_writelocked(seqlock_t *sl)
+{
+ return spin_is_locked(&sl->lock);
+}
+
static inline int write_tryseqlock(seqlock_t *sl)
{
int ret = spin_trylock(&sl->lock);
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/printk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/printk.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/printk.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
#include <linux/security.h>
#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -982,12 +984,56 @@ int is_console_locked(void)
return console_locked;
}
-void wake_up_klogd(void)
+static int printk_pending;
+
+void __wake_up_klogd(void)
{
+ if (printk_pending)
+ printk_pending = 0;
+
if (!oops_in_progress && waitqueue_active(&log_wait))
wake_up_interruptible(&log_wait);
}
+int printk_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ if (!printk_pending)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Stop the last awake CPU from entering NOHZ state when there still
+ * is a klogd to kick.
+ */
+ return (cpus_weight(cpu_online_map) - cpus_weight(nohz_cpu_mask)) == 1;
+}
+
+void printk_tick(void)
+{
+ if (unlikely(printk_pending))
+ __wake_up_klogd();
+}
+
+static int printk_do_wakeup(void)
+{
+ if (irqs_disabled())
+ return 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HRTICK
+ if (seq_is_writelocked(&xtime_lock))
+ return 0;
+#endif
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
+void wake_up_klogd(void)
+{
+ if (printk_do_wakeup())
+ __wake_up_klogd();
+ else
+ printk_pending = 1;
+}
+
/**
* release_console_sem - unlock the console system
*
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidl
next_jiffies = get_next_timer_interrupt(last_jiffies);
delta_jiffies = next_jiffies - last_jiffies;
- if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu))
+ if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu) || printk_needs_cpu(cpu))
delta_jiffies = 1;
/*
* Do not stop the tick, if we are only one off
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/timer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/timer.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/timer.c
@@ -978,6 +978,7 @@ void update_process_times(int user_tick)
run_local_timers();
if (rcu_pending(cpu))
rcu_check_callbacks(cpu, user_tick);
+ printk_tick();
scheduler_tick();
run_posix_cpu_timers(p);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-24 12:24 [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-24 12:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] printk_nowakeup() Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-24 12:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] time: xtime lock vs printk Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-24 14:21 ` Daniel Walker
2008-03-24 14:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock Marcin Slusarz
2008-03-24 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-24 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-24 18:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-08 13:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-08-08 16:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-08 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 17:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-08 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-08 18:14 ` [PATCH] printk: robustify printk Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 18:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-08 18:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 19:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-08 19:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 19:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-08 19:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-08 20:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-08 20:46 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-08 20:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-08 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-08 20:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-08 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 11:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-11 11:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 11:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-11 14:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-08-11 14:29 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-11 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-08-11 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 12:14 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-11 11:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 12:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-20 12:40 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-08-20 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-20 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-11 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-11 13:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-08 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-08 20:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-08 21:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-08 23:02 ` David Miller
2008-08-09 0:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-08-08 17:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] printk vs rq->lock and xtime lock Steven Rostedt
2008-03-24 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1218203218.8625.114.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcin.slusarz@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox