Re: [PATCH] Make PFN_PHYS return a properly-formed physical address

Andrew Morton
2008-08-08T00:07:32Z

On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:45:12 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Shall we go with just using plain u64 (or unsigned long long if we want
> a really consistent type) in the meantime, and then waffle about
> introducing a new type everywhere?
>
> Or we could redefine resource_size_t to be big enough to refer to any
> resource, including all memory. It's close to being that anyway.

We could do

typedef resource_size_t jeremy_thing_t;

for now and worry about it later if the need arises, perhaps.