Re: [PATCH 1/2] add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses

Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-11T22:50:54Z

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Are we sure resource_size_t is -never- used to represent memory ? I
> though it was on some platforms....

On x86 it's optionally used to put memory in the resource tree, but if
the memory is larger than can be held in resource_size_t it simply skips
it. Don't know about elsewhere.

J