From: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1][PATCH] POSIX SCHED_SPORADIC implementation for tasks and groups
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:27:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219012051.25992.31.camel@Palanthas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48A0741F.60901@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1672 bytes --]
On Mon, 2008-08-11 at 10:17 -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > Well, a new version of glibc could use those to implement the posix
> > interface. Because as I understand it, glibc can break ABI on certain
> > version bumps.
>
> In theory. But this hasn't happened so far and I don't expect it to
> happen any time soon. New interfaces are not a real problem for me, though.
>
Ok, we'll see.
I still think that SCHED_SPORADIC task (but specially group!) scheduling
could be useful, even with a non fully-POSIX interface.
This mail only to say that I'm actively working on it, i.e., I'm
rewriting it with the new sched_param2/sched_setscheduler2 interface and
fixing some very glaring bugs that was present in my first code. :-P
Unfortunately, I'll be off the PC till September 4th... If you are still
interested in, we will talk about it at that time, when I'll post the
new version of the RFC.
I also hope, by then, to be able to show you some test cases and
overhead estimation.
Thanks all of you for minding me, and sorry if I wasted some of your
time. :-)
Best Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>>
(Raistlin Majere, DragonLance Chronicles -Dragons of Spring Drawning-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli
GNU/Linux Registered User: #340657
Web: http://www.linux.it/~raistlin
Blog: http://blog.linux.it/raistlin
SIP Account: dario.faggioli@sipproxy.wengo.fr or
raistlin@ekiga.net
Jabber Account: dario.faggioli@jabber.org/WengoPhone
GnuPG Key ID: 4DC83AC4
GnuPG Key Fingerprint: 2A78 AD5D B9CF A082 0836 08AD 9385 DA04 4DC8 3AC4
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-17 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-11 13:49 [RFC 0/1][PATCH] POSIX SCHED_SPORADIC implementation for tasks and groups Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 14:11 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-08-11 14:25 ` Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 16:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-08-11 16:49 ` Dario Faggioli
2008-08-11 17:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2008-08-17 22:27 ` Dario Faggioli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219012051.25992.31.camel@Palanthas \
--to=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox