public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
@ 2008-08-21  3:46 Yinghai Lu
  2008-08-21  4:03 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-08-21  3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton
  Cc: linux-kernel, Yinghai Lu

acording to Suresh Siddha, we should have spin_lock around it

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c |    6 ++++++
 kernel/irq/handle.c       |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned in
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
+
 struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
@@ -182,6 +185,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock(&sparse_irq_lock);
 	/*
 	 *  we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
 	 */
@@ -223,6 +227,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
 	else
 		sparse_irqs = desc;
 	desc->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
+
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_cfg *cfg, *cfg_pri;
@@ -226,6 +228,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock(&irq_cfg_lock);
 	if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
 		unsigned long phys;
 		unsigned long total_bytes;
@@ -263,6 +266,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
 	else
 		irq_cfgx = cfg;
 	cfg->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock(&irq_cfg_lock);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
  2008-08-21  3:46 [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-08-21  4:03 ` Andrew Morton
  2008-08-21  8:58   ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-08-21  4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yinghai Lu; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel

On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:46:25 -0700 Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:

> acording to Suresh Siddha, we should have spin_lock around it
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c |    6 ++++++
>  kernel/irq/handle.c       |    7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned in
>  	}
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
> +
>  struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
>  {
>  	struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
> @@ -182,6 +185,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
>  		count++;
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock(&sparse_irq_lock);
>  	/*
>  	 *  we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
>  	 */
> @@ -223,6 +227,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
>  	else
>  		sparse_irqs = desc;
>  	desc->irq = irq;
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
> +
>  	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
>  	{
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
> +
>  static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
>  {
>  	struct irq_cfg *cfg, *cfg_pri;
> @@ -226,6 +228,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
>  		count++;
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock(&irq_cfg_lock);
>  	if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
>  		unsigned long phys;
>  		unsigned long total_bytes;
> @@ -263,6 +266,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
>  	else
>  		irq_cfgx = cfg;
>  	cfg->irq = irq;
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&irq_cfg_lock);
> +
>  	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
>  	{

Each of these locks can be made local to the function in which they are
used (and hence they should be made local).

It would be nice to add a comment explaining what they are protecting,
unless that is obvious (I didn't look).


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
  2008-08-21  4:03 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-08-21  8:58   ` Ingo Molnar
  2008-08-21 10:27     ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-08-21  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Yinghai Lu, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel


* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Each of these locks can be made local to the function in which they 
> are used (and hence they should be made local).
> 
> It would be nice to add a comment explaining what they are protecting, 
> unless that is obvious (I didn't look).

ok - i moved the locks next to the data structure they protect (the free 
list head), and added a small exlanation as well - as per the commit 
below.

	Ingo

--------------------->
>From 6feb0ac69551df02b49d11794ee77d3ad47aaeb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:46:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq needs spin_lock in allocations

Suresh Siddha noticed that we should have a spinlock around it.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c |   10 ++++++++++
 kernel/irq/handle.c       |   10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
index 34c74cf..d1370ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ static void init_one_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
 }
 
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx;
+
+/*
+ * Protect the irq_cfgx_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx_free;
 #endif
@@ -226,6 +232,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock(&irq_cfg_lock);
 	if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
 		unsigned long phys;
 		unsigned long total_bytes;
@@ -263,6 +270,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 	else
 		irq_cfgx = cfg;
 	cfg->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock(&irq_cfg_lock);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 24c83a3..2f02e14 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ static void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int nr_desc, int nr)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Protect the sparse_irqs_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
 static struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs_free;
 struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs;
@@ -166,6 +171,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
+
 struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
@@ -182,6 +188,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock(&sparse_irq_lock);
 	/*
 	 *  we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
 	 */
@@ -223,6 +230,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 	else
 		sparse_irqs = desc;
 	desc->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
  2008-08-21  8:58   ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-08-21 10:27     ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-08-21 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Yinghai Lu, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Each of these locks can be made local to the function in which they 
> > are used (and hence they should be made local).
> > 
> > It would be nice to add a comment explaining what they are protecting, 
> > unless that is obvious (I didn't look).
> 
> ok - i moved the locks next to the data structure they protect (the free 
> list head), and added a small exlanation as well - as per the commit 
> below.

they also need to be irqsafe locks, as they might be taken inside 
irq-safe locks. Updated patch below.

	Ingo

>From a532e19680ada3b8579b81e67e76d3ebd19c340f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:46:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq needs spin_lock in allocations

Suresh Siddha noticed that we should have a spinlock around it.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 kernel/irq/handle.c       |   13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
index 34c74cf..7ca5566 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ static void init_one_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
 }
 
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx;
+
+/*
+ * Protect the irq_cfgx_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx_free;
 #endif
@@ -213,8 +219,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
 static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_cfg *cfg, *cfg_pri;
-	int i;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int count = 0;
+	int i;
 
 	cfg_pri = cfg = irq_cfgx;
 	while (cfg) {
@@ -226,6 +233,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_cfg_lock, flags);
 	if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
 		unsigned long phys;
 		unsigned long total_bytes;
@@ -263,6 +271,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 	else
 		irq_cfgx = cfg;
 	cfg->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_cfg_lock, flags);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 24c83a3..d638a91 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ static void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int nr_desc, int nr)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Protect the sparse_irqs_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
 static struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs_free;
 struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs;
@@ -166,11 +171,13 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
 	}
 	return NULL;
 }
+
 struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
-	int i;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int count = 0;
+	int i;
 
 	desc_pri = desc = sparse_irqs;
 	while (desc) {
@@ -182,6 +189,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 		count++;
 	}
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
 	/*
 	 *  we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
 	 */
@@ -223,6 +231,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
 	else
 		sparse_irqs = desc;
 	desc->irq = irq;
+
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
+
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
 	{

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-21 10:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-21  3:46 [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-21  4:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21  8:58   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-21 10:27     ` Ingo Molnar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox