* [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
@ 2008-08-21 3:46 Yinghai Lu
2008-08-21 4:03 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yinghai Lu @ 2008-08-21 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, Andrew Morton
Cc: linux-kernel, Yinghai Lu
acording to Suresh Siddha, we should have spin_lock around it
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/irq/handle.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned in
}
return NULL;
}
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
+
struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
{
struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
@@ -182,6 +185,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
count++;
}
+ spin_lock(&sparse_irq_lock);
/*
* we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
*/
@@ -223,6 +227,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
else
sparse_irqs = desc;
desc->irq = irq;
+
+ spin_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
+
printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
{
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned
return NULL;
}
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
+
static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
{
struct irq_cfg *cfg, *cfg_pri;
@@ -226,6 +228,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
count++;
}
+ spin_lock(&irq_cfg_lock);
if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
unsigned long phys;
unsigned long total_bytes;
@@ -263,6 +266,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
else
irq_cfgx = cfg;
cfg->irq = irq;
+
+ spin_unlock(&irq_cfg_lock);
+
printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
{
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
2008-08-21 3:46 [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc Yinghai Lu
@ 2008-08-21 4:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-08-21 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yinghai Lu; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:46:25 -0700 Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> acording to Suresh Siddha, we should have spin_lock around it
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c | 6 ++++++
> kernel/irq/handle.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/irq/handle.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/irq/handle.c
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned in
> }
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
> +
> struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
> {
> struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
> @@ -182,6 +185,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
> count++;
> }
>
> + spin_lock(&sparse_irq_lock);
> /*
> * we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
> */
> @@ -223,6 +227,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsig
> else
> sparse_irqs = desc;
> desc->irq = irq;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
> +
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
> {
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
> +
> static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
> {
> struct irq_cfg *cfg, *cfg_pri;
> @@ -226,6 +228,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
> count++;
> }
>
> + spin_lock(&irq_cfg_lock);
> if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
> unsigned long phys;
> unsigned long total_bytes;
> @@ -263,6 +266,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(uns
> else
> irq_cfgx = cfg;
> cfg->irq = irq;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&irq_cfg_lock);
> +
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
> {
Each of these locks can be made local to the function in which they are
used (and hence they should be made local).
It would be nice to add a comment explaining what they are protecting,
unless that is obvious (I didn't look).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
2008-08-21 4:03 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-08-21 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-21 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-08-21 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Yinghai Lu, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Each of these locks can be made local to the function in which they
> are used (and hence they should be made local).
>
> It would be nice to add a comment explaining what they are protecting,
> unless that is obvious (I didn't look).
ok - i moved the locks next to the data structure they protect (the free
list head), and added a small exlanation as well - as per the commit
below.
Ingo
--------------------->
>From 6feb0ac69551df02b49d11794ee77d3ad47aaeb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:46:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq needs spin_lock in allocations
Suresh Siddha noticed that we should have a spinlock around it.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c | 10 ++++++++++
kernel/irq/handle.c | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
index 34c74cf..d1370ce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ static void init_one_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
}
static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx;
+
+/*
+ * Protect the irq_cfgx_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx_free;
#endif
@@ -226,6 +232,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
count++;
}
+ spin_lock(&irq_cfg_lock);
if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
unsigned long phys;
unsigned long total_bytes;
@@ -263,6 +270,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
else
irq_cfgx = cfg;
cfg->irq = irq;
+
+ spin_unlock(&irq_cfg_lock);
+
printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
{
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 24c83a3..2f02e14 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ static void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int nr_desc, int nr)
}
}
+/*
+ * Protect the sparse_irqs_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
static struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs_free;
struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs;
@@ -166,6 +171,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
}
return NULL;
}
+
struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
{
struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
@@ -182,6 +188,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
count++;
}
+ spin_lock(&sparse_irq_lock);
/*
* we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
*/
@@ -223,6 +230,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
else
sparse_irqs = desc;
desc->irq = irq;
+
+ spin_unlock(&sparse_irq_lock);
+
printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
{
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc
2008-08-21 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-08-21 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-08-21 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Yinghai Lu, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, linux-kernel
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Each of these locks can be made local to the function in which they
> > are used (and hence they should be made local).
> >
> > It would be nice to add a comment explaining what they are protecting,
> > unless that is obvious (I didn't look).
>
> ok - i moved the locks next to the data structure they protect (the free
> list head), and added a small exlanation as well - as per the commit
> below.
they also need to be irqsafe locks, as they might be taken inside
irq-safe locks. Updated patch below.
Ingo
>From a532e19680ada3b8579b81e67e76d3ebd19c340f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:46:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq needs spin_lock in allocations
Suresh Siddha noticed that we should have a spinlock around it.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
kernel/irq/handle.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
index 34c74cf..7ca5566 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ static void init_one_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
}
static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx;
+
+/*
+ * Protect the irq_cfgx_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_cfg_lock);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfgx_free;
#endif
@@ -213,8 +219,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
{
struct irq_cfg *cfg, *cfg_pri;
- int i;
+ unsigned long flags;
int count = 0;
+ int i;
cfg_pri = cfg = irq_cfgx;
while (cfg) {
@@ -226,6 +233,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
count++;
}
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_cfg_lock, flags);
if (!irq_cfgx_free) {
unsigned long phys;
unsigned long total_bytes;
@@ -263,6 +271,9 @@ static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
else
irq_cfgx = cfg;
cfg->irq = irq;
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_cfg_lock, flags);
+
printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_cfg for irq %d\n", cfg->irq);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
{
diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c
index 24c83a3..d638a91 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/handle.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c
@@ -107,6 +107,11 @@ static void init_kstat_irqs(struct irq_desc *desc, int nr_desc, int nr)
}
}
+/*
+ * Protect the sparse_irqs_free freelist:
+ */
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sparse_irq_lock);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ
static struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs_free;
struct irq_desc *sparse_irqs;
@@ -166,11 +171,13 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc(unsigned int irq)
}
return NULL;
}
+
struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
{
struct irq_desc *desc, *desc_pri;
- int i;
+ unsigned long flags;
int count = 0;
+ int i;
desc_pri = desc = sparse_irqs;
while (desc) {
@@ -182,6 +189,7 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
count++;
}
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
/*
* we run out of pre-allocate ones, allocate more
*/
@@ -223,6 +231,9 @@ struct irq_desc *irq_to_desc_alloc(unsigned int irq)
else
sparse_irqs = desc;
desc->irq = irq;
+
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sparse_irq_lock, flags);
+
printk(KERN_DEBUG "found new irq_desc for irq %d\n", desc->irq);
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ_DEBUG
{
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-21 10:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-21 3:46 [PATCH] x86: sparse_irq need spin_lock in alloc Yinghai Lu
2008-08-21 4:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-21 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-21 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox