From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH] leds: fix oops race in led trigger registration
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:06:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219306014.5385.9.camel@dax.rpnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080821071750.GA8046@localhost.localdomain>
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 09:17 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> I resubmit this, which was posted a month ago, with no responses from
> the maintainer (and no recent fixes in this area either). I have not
> tested it myself, but I am reasonably confident that this is an
> obviously correct fix. I guess it would not hurt to exercise it as well.
>
> Zdenek: Have recent kernels also been showing this behaviour? Did the
> patch fix the problem for you? You said something about a new issue
> showing up, do you think that was related to this patch?
>
> Also, just one question (since I'm newbie at this): Is it dangerous to
> register the &dev_attr_trigger device file before we put the device on
> the list or initialize it completely? If so, the initialization should
> probably be moved all to the top before the file is made public.
This patch isn't quite right since whilst it fixes one race, it opens up
a number of other potential problems. We definitely should have the led
listed in leds_list before calling the various functions and the
existing init order is correct in that sense.
I suspect your problem is caused by something calling a trigger
registration between the point its added to the list and the
init_rwsem(). The best solution is to move the init_rwsem() to earlier
in the function. Yes, that means some ifdef ugliness but so be it. Could
you see whether you still see the problem with the patch below?
Cheers,
Richard
diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class.c b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
index 559a408..c9d8219 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/led-class.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ int led_classdev_register(struct device *parent, struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
if (rc)
goto err_out;
+#ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS
+ init_rwsem(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
+#endif
/* add to the list of leds */
down_write(&leds_list_lock);
list_add_tail(&led_cdev->node, &leds_list);
@@ -121,8 +124,6 @@ int led_classdev_register(struct device *parent, struct led_classdev *led_cdev)
led_update_brightness(led_cdev);
#ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS
- init_rwsem(&led_cdev->trigger_lock);
-
rc = device_create_file(led_cdev->dev, &dev_attr_trigger);
if (rc)
goto err_out_led_list;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-21 7:17 [RESEND][RFC][PATCH] leds: fix oops race in led trigger registration Vegard Nossum
2008-08-21 8:06 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2008-08-26 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219306014.5385.9.camel@dax.rpnet.com \
--to=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox