From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: John Blackwood <john.blackwood@ccur.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_rt_rq_enqueue() resched idle
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:03:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219824217.6462.44.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B454F7.5060106@ccur.com>
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 15:09 -0400, John Blackwood wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> When sysctl_sched_rt_runtime is set to something other than -1 and the
> CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED kernel parameter is NOT enabled, we get into a state
> where we see one or more CPUs idling forvever even though there are
> real-time
> tasks in their rt runqueue that are able to run (no longer throttled).
>
> The sequence is:
>
> - A real-time task is running when the timer sets the rt runqueue
> to throttled, and the rt task is resched_task()ed and switched
> out, and idle is switched in since there are no non-rt tasks to
> run on that cpu.
>
> - Eventually the do_sched_rt_period_timer() runs and un-throttles
> the rt runqueue, but we just exit the timer interrupt and go back
> to executing the idle task in the idle loop forever.
>
> If we change the sched_rt_rq_enqueue() routine to use some of the code
> from the CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled version of this same routine and
> resched_task() the currently executing task (idle in our case) if it is
> a lower priority task than the higher rt task in the now un-throttled
> runqueue, the problem is no longer observed.
Very good spotting, Thanks!
However I think the patch isn't quite good, as highest_prio is only
available on SMP || RT_GROUP_SCHED.
Furthermore, on !RT_GROUP_SCHED any RT task will be higher than current,
so we can do the below, do you agree?
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 94daace..f672aee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -199,6 +199,8 @@ static inline struct rt_rq *group_rt_rq(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se)
static inline void sched_rt_rq_enqueue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
+ if (rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
+ resched_task(rq_of_rt_rq(rt_rq)->curr);
}
static inline void sched_rt_rq_dequeue(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-27 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-26 19:09 [PATCH] sched_rt_rq_enqueue() resched idle John Blackwood
2008-08-27 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-27 13:05 John Blackwood
2008-08-27 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1219824217.6462.44.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=john.blackwood@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox