public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@tglx.de,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout()
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:59:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220025598.4417.63.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080829080809.0e42a323@infradead.org>

On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 08:08 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> rom: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:45:38 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout()
> 
> now that we have schedule_hrtimeout(), make select() use it.
> But only for short delays; really long delays are assumed to not
> need the highres level of accuracy but rather want the regular
> timer behavior for now.
> 
> This is only done for delays shorter than 1 second; currently
> the assumption is that longer delays have no desire to get the
> higher accuracy.

Do you have any basis to make this "short delays" assumption? I would
think if regular timers can be used for longer than a second, people
will naturally assume anything else that's high res will also ..

The futex_wait() has code which looks a lot like your
schedule_hrtimeout() , (you might want to replace your code there
instead) , and it doesn't seem to have the short delays restriction ..

Daniel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-29 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-29 15:05 [patch 0/5] Nano/Microsecond resolution for select() and poll() Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] select: add a timespec version of the timeout to select/poll Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-30  2:10   ` Andrew Morton
2008-08-30  2:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] select: return accurate remainer in select() and ppoll() Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] select: introduce a schedule_hrtimeout() function Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] select: make select() use schedule_hrtimeout() Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:36   ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-29 15:59   ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2008-08-29 16:20   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-29 16:11     ` Alan Cox
2008-08-29 17:26       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-29 17:42         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 18:18         ` Alan Cox
2008-08-29 18:46           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-29 18:33             ` Alan Cox
2008-08-30 15:25               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 16:30     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] select: make poll() use schedule_hrtimeout() as well Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 15:54 ` [patch 0/5] Nano/Microsecond resolution for select() and poll() Arnd Bergmann
2008-08-29 16:12   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-29 22:15 ` Brian Wellington

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1220025598.4417.63.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@tglx.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox