From: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@linux.intel.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
bgmerrell@novell.com, hirofuchi@users.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, usbip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: USBIP protocol
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220049103.7145.23.camel@californication> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ej47q5k8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Hi Matthew,
> > I'm in the middle of implementing a userspace client for usbip and I
> > strongly feel that the protocol needs to be changed before it is merged.
> >
> > - I'm unconvinced that TCP is the correct protocol to be running this over.
> > I understand the reluctance to use UDP, but the protocol is fundamentally
> > packet-based. If TCP is used, the delimitation of packets within the
> > stream needs to be much more robust.
>
> If you want reliable transport with record boundaries an alternative
> would be also SCTP. Main drawback is that firewalls often don't support it
> though (but presumably that wouldn't be a big issue for this)
I would also have proposed SCTP. The telco carries seems be very happy
with it.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-29 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-29 14:02 USBIP protocol Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 14:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-29 22:31 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2008-08-29 20:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 20:51 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-08-29 14:30 ` Greg KH
2008-08-29 14:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 14:54 ` Greg KH
2008-08-29 15:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-29 15:53 ` Dave Higton
2008-09-03 4:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-03 15:40 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-03 19:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-03 20:15 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-04 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-04 22:15 ` Greg KH
2008-09-05 3:26 ` Pete Zaitcev
2008-09-05 11:37 ` Tilman Schmidt
2008-09-05 15:05 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-09 0:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-09 7:12 ` Steve Calfee
2008-09-09 7:33 ` Greg KH
2008-09-09 8:04 ` Greg KH
2008-09-09 15:21 ` Alan Stern
2008-09-03 15:57 ` Greg KH
2008-09-03 19:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-04 2:41 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1220049103.7145.23.camel@californication \
--to=holtmann@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bgmerrell@novell.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hirofuchi@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=usbip-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox