From: Arne Redlich <agr@powerkom-dd.de>
To: rae l <crquan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ross S. W. Walker" <RWalker@medallion.com>,
iscsitarget-devel <iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
unh-iscsi-checkins@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Iscsitarget-devel] [RFC] future IET development
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 07:25:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220246718.8763.31.camel@blackadder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91b13c310808311036k2792d1fqaeb94a814f0bee81@mail.gmail.com>
Am Montag, den 01.09.2008, 01:36 +0800 schrieb rae l:
> Have you read the Documentation/ of the kernel?
> Didn't you know the benefits of getting the kernel code into the main
> kernel tree?
>
> Here is some reasons from Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt:
[...]
You can safely assume that we're aware of the benefits of having the
code in the kernel, but it will not happen. It does not make much sense
to merge an iSCSI target into the kernel when there are generic target
frameworks around that can also support different transports such as FC,
FCOE. So there's not the remotest chance of getting IET merged.
Currently there's already STGT code in the kernel. It's basically an
interface for kernel drivers such as FC, however most processing and
many drivers (iSCSI, iSER, FCOE, ...) are done in userspace. And there's
SCST. It also provides several transports and storage backends. It's
mostly implemented in kernel space. Recently there's some movement to
get it into the kernel.
If you're interested in more details just search the linux-scsi and the
respective project's list archives.
> Indeed, in sometimes I observed IET kernel module not very stable on
> the latest 2.6.26 and 27-rcX kernels, sometimes it's kernel oops
> after serveral stop-ietd-unload-ko-load-ko-start-ietd loops, but not
> always reproducible, I'm still tracing on it;
Please post the oops.
Thanks,
Arne
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-01 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1218829367.3145.31.camel@blackadder>
[not found] ` <91b13c310808282007u7fc90eeah2b27661a7a5f595@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <E2BB8074E5500C42984D980D4BD78EF9022A73D4@MFG-NYC-EXCH2.mfg.prv>
2008-08-31 17:36 ` [Iscsitarget-devel] [RFC] future IET development rae l
2008-09-01 5:25 ` Arne Redlich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1220246718.8763.31.camel@blackadder \
--to=agr@powerkom-dd.de \
--cc=RWalker@medallion.com \
--cc=crquan@gmail.com \
--cc=iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=unh-iscsi-checkins@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox