public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:14:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1220490884.22734.83.camel@alok-dev1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809031103090.3243@apollo.tec.linutronix.de>

On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 02:11 -0700, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > This is "wrongish".
> >
> > You really should do the
> >
> >       tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&pm1, hpet ? &hpet1 : NULL);
> >       ...
> >       tsc2 = tsc_read_refs(&pm2, hpet ? &hpet2 : NULL);
> >
> > around the whole loop, because they get more exact with more time inside,
> > and they don't improve from looping around.
> 
> True. Just kept them at the place where my debug patches had left them.

Hi Thomas, 

I agree with Linus that we should move the tsc_read_refs call outside of
the loop. I did those changes and ran some boot-halt tests at my end.
The frequency calibration against the pmtimer/hpet was surely more fine
tuned with this change, the variance that i see now in repeated reboots
is very minimal.

Please have a look at the patch below. 

--
x86: Fine tune TSC calibration.

From: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>

As Linus suggested, we should be moving the tsc_read_refs outside of the
loop, this gives us more accurate TSC calibration when calibrating against
hpet/pmtimer, since we are now calibrating over a period of 250ms.


With SMI_THRESHOLD equals to 50000, in the worst case, tsc values read by
tsc_read_refs, could be off by 50000 ticks. On a 2Ghz processor this would
mean an error of 25us. The tsc frequency is calibrated over a period of 250ms
with this patch, hence the worst case error would be around 100ppm down from
500ppm previously without the patch.

Signed-off-by: Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>
---

 arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)


diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
index 346cae5..bc2c1a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static unsigned long pit_calibrate_tsc(void)
 unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 {
 	u64 tsc1, tsc2, delta, pm1, pm2, hpet1, hpet2;
-	unsigned long tsc_pit_min = ULONG_MAX, tsc_ref_min = ULONG_MAX;
+	unsigned long tsc_pit_min = ULONG_MAX, tsc_ref = ULONG_MAX;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int hpet = is_hpet_enabled(), i;
 
@@ -216,31 +216,35 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 	 * calibration delay loop as we have to wait for a certain
 	 * amount of time anyway.
 	 */
+
+	local_irq_save(flags);
+
+	/*
+	 * Read the start value and the reference count of
+	 * hpet/pmtimer when available. Then do the PIT
+	 * calibration iteratively, which will take at least 250ms,
+	 * and read the end value.
+	 */
+	tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&pm1, hpet ? &hpet1 : NULL);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
 		unsigned long tsc_pit_khz;
 
-		/*
-		 * Read the start value and the reference count of
-		 * hpet/pmtimer when available. Then do the PIT
-		 * calibration, which will take at least 50ms, and
-		 * read the end value.
-		 */
-		local_irq_save(flags);
-		tsc1 = tsc_read_refs(&pm1, hpet ? &hpet1 : NULL);
 		tsc_pit_khz = pit_calibrate_tsc();
-		tsc2 = tsc_read_refs(&pm2, hpet ? &hpet2 : NULL);
-		local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 		/* Pick the lowest PIT TSC calibration so far */
 		tsc_pit_min = min(tsc_pit_min, tsc_pit_khz);
 
-		/* hpet or pmtimer available ? */
-		if (!hpet && !pm1 && !pm2)
-			continue;
+	}
+
+	tsc2 = tsc_read_refs(&pm2, hpet ? &hpet2 : NULL);
+	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
-		/* Check, whether the sampling was disturbed by an SMI */
-		if (tsc1 == ULLONG_MAX || tsc2 == ULLONG_MAX)
-			continue;
+	/*
+	 * Check that, either HPET or PM timer is available and,
+	 * the sampling was not disturbed by an SMI.
+	 */
+	if ((hpet || pm1) && (tsc1 != ULLONG_MAX && tsc2 != ULLONG_MAX)) {
 
 		tsc2 = (tsc2 - tsc1) * 1000000LL;
 
@@ -259,7 +263,7 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 		}
 
 		do_div(tsc2, tsc1);
-		tsc_ref_min = min(tsc_ref_min, (unsigned long) tsc2);
+		tsc_ref = tsc2;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -277,7 +281,7 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 		}
 
 		/* The alternative source failed as well, disable TSC */
-		if (tsc_ref_min == ULONG_MAX) {
+		if (tsc_ref == ULONG_MAX) {
 			printk(KERN_WARNING "TSC: HPET/PMTIMER calibration "
 			       "failed due to SMI disturbance.\n");
 			return 0;
@@ -287,7 +291,7 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "TSC: using %s reference calibration\n",
 		       hpet ? "HPET" : "PMTIMER");
 
-		return tsc_ref_min;
+		return tsc_ref;
 	}
 
 	/* We don't have an alternative source, use the PIT calibration value */
@@ -297,7 +301,7 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 	}
 
 	/* The alternative source failed, use the PIT calibration value */
-	if (tsc_ref_min == ULONG_MAX) {
+	if (tsc_ref == ULONG_MAX) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING "TSC: HPET/PMTIMER calibration failed due "
 		       "to SMI disturbance. Using PIT calibration\n");
 		return tsc_pit_min;
@@ -305,7 +309,7 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 
 	/* Check the reference deviation */
 	delta = ((u64) tsc_pit_min) * 100;
-	do_div(delta, tsc_ref_min);
+	do_div(delta, tsc_ref);
 
 	/*
 	 * If both calibration results are inside a 5% window, the we
@@ -316,13 +320,13 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
 		printk(KERN_INFO "TSC: PIT calibration confirmed by %s.\n",
 		       hpet ? "HPET" : "PMTIMER");
 		printk(KERN_INFO "TSC: using %s calibration value\n",
-		       tsc_pit_min <= tsc_ref_min ? "PIT" :
+		       tsc_pit_min <= tsc_ref ? "PIT" :
 		       hpet ? "HPET" : "PMTIMER");
-		return tsc_pit_min <= tsc_ref_min ? tsc_pit_min : tsc_ref_min;
+		return tsc_pit_min <= tsc_ref ? tsc_pit_min : tsc_ref;
 	}
 
 	printk(KERN_WARNING "TSC: PIT calibration deviates from %s: %lu %lu.\n",
-	       hpet ? "HPET" : "PMTIMER", tsc_pit_min, tsc_ref_min);
+	       hpet ? "HPET" : "PMTIMER", tsc_pit_min, tsc_ref);
 
 	/*
 	 * The calibration values differ too much. In doubt, we use



  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-04  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-31 22:54 Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 Larry Finger
2008-09-01 11:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 15:37   ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 17:49     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 17:44   ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 18:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 19:10       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 20:07         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 21:30           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:02           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 22:33             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:56               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 23:24                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02  6:37                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-02 12:21                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 22:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 23:16             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02  3:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02  3:35                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02  4:54                   ` Larry Finger
2008-09-02  9:17                   ` Alan Cox
2008-09-02 12:15                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 15:09                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 18:14                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 18:41                         ` Alok Kataria
2008-09-02 21:16                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 18:42                         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 21:13                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-02 22:21                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 23:10                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-03  1:49                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-02 22:54                           ` [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-03  2:14                             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-03  9:11                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-04  1:14                                 ` Alok Kataria [this message]
2008-09-04  2:56                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  3:16                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04  3:59                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  4:10                                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04  4:20                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  4:27                                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-04  4:25                                         ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-04  4:53                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-04  5:09                                             ` Willy Tarreau
2008-09-04  1:18                                 ` [PATCH] Change warning message in TSC calibration Alok Kataria
2008-09-03  2:51                             ` [PATCH] Fix TSC calibration issues Larry Finger
2008-09-03  4:00                               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-03  4:34                                 ` Larry Finger
2008-09-05 13:45                       ` Regression in 2.6.27 caused by commit bfc0f59 Mark Lord
2008-09-02 17:17                 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-09-01 19:36       ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 20:09         ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 20:23           ` Larry Finger
2008-09-01 20:45             ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-01 18:42     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-09-01 19:08       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1220490884.22734.83.camel@alok-dev1 \
    --to=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox