From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756359AbYIDOGS (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:06:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751924AbYIDOGI (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:06:08 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:52342 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750958AbYIDOGH (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2008 10:06:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart From: Dave Hansen To: Andrey Mirkin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: <1220439476-16465-1-git-send-email-major@openvz.org> References: <1220439476-16465-1-git-send-email-major@openvz.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 07:05:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1220537154.23620.34.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org So, just like the I/O controller patches, we surely can't just throw patch sets back and forth at each other. We're also sure to wear out any potential reviewers, especially on LKML. The differences you've described between this and Oren's patches are pretty small, all things considered. Would you be willing to simply help with Oren's patches or port things over from this set instead of working on a completely disjoint set? -- Dave