From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753828AbYIHMWs (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:22:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752488AbYIHMWk (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:22:40 -0400 Received: from ganymede.vroon.org ([195.66.242.11]:54594 "EHLO ganymede.vroon.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752367AbYIHMWj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:22:39 -0400 Subject: Re: Request for MCE decode (AMD Barcelona, fam 10h) From: Tony Vroon To: Andi Kleen Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <87abeivrdf.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <1220754742.8530.12.camel@localhost> <87abeivrdf.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TrO4oSsidJgfvC5P1qQO" Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:22:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1220876559.27320.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-TrO4oSsidJgfvC5P1qQO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 12:55 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > It unfortunately turns out that mcelog logging is a tricky > psychological problem. How should the warning above have > looked like so that you would not have required "peer insight" > and actually just contacted your hardware vendor?=20 Indication of the faulty part, so I know whether to contact AMD or Tyan. Without a clear idea of which it could quickly turn into an infinite redirect loop between the two. Regards, Tony V. --=-TrO4oSsidJgfvC5P1qQO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkjFGQ8ACgkQp5vW4rUFj5o+TwCffNZKD3Jvu5UzndLpd16WD2As /5IAnR9iUyzwjK3JquhKaA01Daeec5rR =mzQh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-TrO4oSsidJgfvC5P1qQO--