From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753399AbYIJQJ7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:09:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751907AbYIJQJv (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:09:51 -0400 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:52745 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901AbYIJQJu (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:09:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC v4][PATCH 9/9] File descriprtors (restore) From: Dave Hansen To: Oren Laadan Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, jeremy@goop.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <48C727B6.9000700@cs.columbia.edu> References: <1220946154-15174-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> <1220946154-15174-10-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> <1220977581.23386.216.camel@nimitz> <48C727B6.9000700@cs.columbia.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:09:29 -0700 Message-Id: <1221062969.6781.5.camel@nimitz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:49 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: > > Dave Hansen wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 03:42 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: > >> +static int cr_close_all_fds(struct files_struct *files) > >> +{ > >> + int *fdtable; > >> + int n; > >> + > >> + do { > >> + n = cr_scan_fds(files, &fdtable); > >> + if (n < 0) > >> + return n; > >> + while (n--) > >> + sys_close(fdtable[n]); > >> + kfree(fdtable); > >> + } while (n != -1); > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > > > > This needs to use an ERR_PTR(). It will save using the double-pointer. > > I suppose you refer to the call to cr_scan_fds(): either 'fdtable' > or 'n' will have to pass-by-reference. Is it that you prefer it to be > fdtable = cr_scan_fds(files, &n); > ? I was misreading the use of 'n'. Can you really not use close_files() for this operation? You'd need to add some locking around it, but I think it does what you need here. -- Dave