From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755324AbYIKCav (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:30:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752340AbYIKCa3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:30:29 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:55633 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752304AbYIKCa3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:30:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,375,1217833200"; d="scan'208";a="44742312" From: Sheng Yang To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Clean up for MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:33:50 +0800 Message-Id: <1221100432-9511-1-git-send-email-sheng.yang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.5.4.3 In-Reply-To: <> References: <> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Ingo Here is some follow up clean up for "Move VMX MSRs to msr-index.h". After discussion with Avi, I found it's more proper to move MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL bits to msr-index.h as well. But I got a little puzzle about where to accept these patches. I suppose these can be picked up by tip then go with kvm when it merge upstream? The main problem is macro name changed to keep consistent style. Thanks! -- regards Yang, Sheng