From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755568AbYIYPfU@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755568AbYIYPfU (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:35:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753800AbYIYPfB
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:35:01 -0400
Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:42761 "EHLO
	accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753289AbYIYPfA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:35:00 -0400
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] bfa: Brocade BFA FC SCSI Driver submission
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jing Huang <huangj@Brocade.COM>
Cc: Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
       linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Ramkumar Vadivelu <rvadivel@Brocade.COM>,
       Vinodh Ravindran <vravindr@Brocade.COM>,
       "Srikanth Rayas (CW)" <srayas@Brocade.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4C94DE2070B172459E4F1EE14BD2364E01F27D54@HQ-EXCH-5.corp.brocade.com>
References: <4C94DE2070B172459E4F1EE14BD2364E01F27D19@HQ-EXCH-5.corp.brocade.com>
	 <20080925044923.GA4310@kroah.com>
	 <1222319644.3602.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <4C94DE2070B172459E4F1EE14BD2364E01F27D49@HQ-EXCH-5.corp.brocade.com>
	 <20080925055725.GC66712@sgi.com>
	 <4C94DE2070B172459E4F1EE14BD2364E01F27D54@HQ-EXCH-5.corp.brocade.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:34:39 -0700
Message-Id: <1222356879.3610.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 23:09 -0700, Jing Huang wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> I looked at Documentation/email-clients.txt. There is no info about
> outlook. So I believe Jeremy is right. 
> 
> Is attachment acceptable for my first submission? Meanwhile I will find
> out if I can use other email client in my company.

Yes ... attachments can be tolerated for people who are forced to use
outlook.  We had a similar issue with Adaptec engineers.  There are
rumours that outlook can be persuaded not to mangle text, but everyone
who claims to be able to do it has been unable to reproduce under
laboratory conditions.

James