From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
od@suse.com, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hch@lst.de, David Wilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/10] relay revamp, third installment
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:17:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1222496261.6710.71.camel@charm-linux> (raw)
Here's the current relay cleanup patchset.
1-2 make the write path completely replaceable.
3 adds flags along with some related cleanup.
4-8 remove the padding in several stages.
The new patches in this set are:
9 simplifies the callbacks - now that we have flags, the subbuf_start
callback is much simpler, has been combined with notify_consumers and
has been renamed new_subbuf. Because part of the simplification has
been to handle buffer-full conditions and count lost events internally,
normal applications don't have to pay attention to it at all.
10 completely removes the idea of sub-buffers completely and now deals
only with pages. relay_open() channges accordingly - buffer sizes are
now in pages and consumers are woken only every n_wakeup pages, or never
if this is 0.
It's a work in progress, but because I wanted the intermediate stages to
actually work and not break anything, some of these patches, especially
05, are just temporary and will be removed in the next iteration.
I didn't have time to clean up the first 3 either - I'll also do that
the next time around.
In the next round I plan to do vmap removal.
Tom
reply other threads:[~2008-09-27 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1222496261.6710.71.camel@charm-linux \
--to=zanussi@comcast.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=dwilder@us.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=od@suse.com \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox