From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Remove lock ordering violation in sysfs_chmod_file.
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:19:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223414381.31401.15.camel@nimitz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m11vys7k92.fsf_-_@frodo.ebiederm.org>
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 03:49 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> It is a wee bit subtle but sysfs_get_dentry grabs inode->i_mutex.
> of potentially all of the parents of sd. So I can not hold
> the inode mutex of the directory while it is called.
Hi Eric,
This patch looks good to me. In my quest to parse exactly what was
going on, I rewrote a description of the patch. Could you look over
this and see if I'm on target?
--
Before this patch, inode->i_mutex is held in order to keep the inode's
mode and ctime from changing out underneath us. If we didn't do this,
you could potentially get garbage when reading them out of the old
inode. We calculated these new permissions once since it is redundant
to do it several times.
We also need to perform a sysfs_get_dentry() operation on the
sysfs_dirent in order to find all the dentries on each sb. This needs
to be performed once for each sb in which the inode appears. "[B]ut
sysfs_get_dentry grabs inode->i_mutex. of potentially all of the parents
of sd. So I can not hold the inode mutex of the directory while it is
called."
This patch drops the inode->i_mutex over the entire "for each
sysfs_dirent" loop. It, instead, reacquires and drops it each time we
need to calculate the new mode/ctime for the target dentries. It does
this away from the sysfs_get_dentry() call now.
-- Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-07 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-22 14:31 sysfs: tagged directories not merged completely yet Benjamin Thery
2008-09-22 15:34 ` Greg KH
2008-09-22 20:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-09-23 14:24 ` Benjamin Thery
2008-09-23 18:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-03 10:13 ` Al Viro
2008-10-05 5:32 ` Greg KH
2008-10-07 8:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 10:47 ` [PATCH 0/3] minor sysfs tagged directory fixes Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Remove lock ordering violation in sysfs_chmod_file Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: Fix and sysfs_mv_dir by using lock_rename Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 10:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] sysfs: Take sysfs_mutex when fetching the root inode Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: Fix and sysfs_mv_dir by using lock_rename Dave Hansen
2008-10-07 21:19 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2008-10-07 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] sysfs: Remove lock ordering violation in sysfs_chmod_file Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 22:27 ` sysfs: tagged directories not merged completely yet Greg KH
2008-10-07 22:54 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-07 23:39 ` Greg KH
2008-10-08 0:12 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-08 0:38 ` Greg KH
2008-10-08 14:18 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-07 23:34 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-14 1:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-14 7:55 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-14 12:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-15 11:04 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-16 21:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-14 18:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-15 0:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-15 13:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-10-15 13:54 ` Benjamin Thery
2008-10-08 0:39 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-08 1:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 8:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 9:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-07 9:12 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-07 11:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-07 12:19 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-07 23:17 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-08 0:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-08 0:20 ` Tejun Heo
2008-10-08 0:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1223414381.31401.15.camel@nimitz \
--to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox