Re: FRV/ARM unaligned access question

[Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>]

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 12:16 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Switching to the packed struct algorithms also reduces the kernel size very
> slightly.  Before:
> 
> 	warthog>size vmlinux
> 	   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 	2207836   66588  150189 2424613  24ff25 vmlinux
> 
> After:
> 
> 	warthog>size vmlinux
> 	   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 	2207804   66588  150189 2424581  24ff05 vmlinux

Probably smaller as now the le values aren't being byteswapped anymore,
only the native endianess can use the struct version.  Care to look at
the kernel size with the following instead?

From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] frv: switch unaligned access to the packed-struct implementation

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
---
 include/asm-frv/unaligned.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-frv/unaligned.h b/include/asm-frv/unaligned.h
index 839a2fb..6c61c05 100644
--- a/include/asm-frv/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-frv/unaligned.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 #define _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
 
 #include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
-#include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
 #include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 
 #define get_unaligned	__get_unaligned_be
-- 
1.6.0.2.471.g47a76