public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sam@ravnborg.org, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Possible bug in SCSI Kconfig
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:44:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1224704659.6851.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b637ec0b0810221225q589ed071i75f559d6fa76d96b@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 21:25 +0200, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:05 PM, James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 18:29 +0200, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >> In kernel 2.6.27.2 - drivers/scsi/Kconfig we have:
> >>
> >> config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
> >>         tristate
> >>         default m
> >>         depends on SCSI
> >>         depends on MODULES
> >>
> >> The tristate field is empty. This has the effect that this option is
> >> not visible in menuconfig and so it's always selected. The default is
> >> "m" for all architectures and so this module is always compiled if
> >> SCSI and MODULES are both enabled.
> >>
> >> I'm using a patch like this one:
> >>
> >>  config SCSI_WAIT_SCAN
> >> -     tristate
> >> +     tristate "Wait until all the async scans are complete"
> >>       default m
> >>       depends on SCSI
> >>       depends on MODULES
> >>
> >> to get rid of that module.
> >>
> >> Of course, I have no idea if this is correct or the current behavior
> >> is the expected one.
> >
> > The point of all of this is that if you enable async scanning, you need
> > a method of waiting for the scans to complete, which is all this module
> > does (you insert it and it doesn't come back from the insertion until
> > all the pending async scans are complete).  It's tristate because really
> > it only makes sense to be M or N.  The consensus is that, given async
> > scanning is always an option, this function should always be built as a
> > module *if* modules and SCSI are enabled ... because you might have a
> > HBA module you enabled async scanning for and you need to wait.
> 
> OK, I see your point.
> 
> But in my case I have SCSI enabled only because it's SELECTed by ATA
> (it's just a laptop) and I don't have any hba's and never will. So no
> async scan.

Presumably you have a laptop hard disk.  That's currently SCSI if you
use ATA ... although when ATA moves out of SCSI it will no longer be, so
you could regard this as a temporary condition.

> Maybe this module should be enabled if async scan is.

But that's the point: async scan is always "enabled" it just might not
be the default, that's what the CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC controls: the
default value (but you can always turn it on with the kernel boot or
SCSI module option).  Async scan is also functional for /drivers/ata and
other hot plug type busses, so it still makes sense for them as well.

> > There's really not much point giving the user the choice, since this
> > module is part of the initrd sequence ... it's not really anything a
> > user would want to use stand alone, hence there's no point giving a
> > choice about it.
> >
> 
> I don't use initrd at all. I just noticed the existence of this module
> while trying to have a non modular kernel. This failed because of
> ipw2200 and after having enabled modules again I just found this
> scsi_wait_scan.ko.

Well, we do use CONFIG_MODULES to try to discern whether the user wants
modules or not.  However, if you enable modules, we'd need some
telepathic configurator to tell us if you plan to use SCSI HBA modules
or not, so the safest course is always to enable it.  The real point is
that you have to be a real power user to answer N correctly to this, so
it's better not to confuse the remaining 97% with the option because
they could easily get wrong ... the 3% who're sure they don't want it
can simply delete it.

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-22 19:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-22 16:29 Possible bug in SCSI Kconfig Fabio Comolli
2008-10-22 18:35 ` Stefan Richter
2008-10-22 19:29   ` Fabio Comolli
2008-10-22 19:05 ` James Bottomley
2008-10-22 19:25   ` Fabio Comolli
2008-10-22 19:26     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-22 19:31       ` Fabio Comolli
2008-10-22 19:34         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-22 19:45           ` Fabio Comolli
2008-10-22 19:44     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-10-22 19:48       ` Fabio Comolli
2008-10-23 17:30       ` Stefan Richter
2008-10-23 17:39         ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-23 18:59           ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1224704659.6851.28.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=fabio.comolli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox