From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, vatsa@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] scheduler patches
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:29:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1224844151.27946.1.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081024102655.GA1738@elte.hu>
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > 6-8 29 work
>
> Could we have a #9 that uses a no-fastpath-overhead min() method instead
> of avg_vruntime? Maybe we can get away without that overhead?
Looking at that suggestion, maybe I'll redo 7/8 so at to not depend on
6/8 using min from the get-go and fixing that XXX as well.
Will have to poke at it a little.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-24 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-24 9:06 [PATCH 0/8] scheduler patches Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched: fix a find_busiest_group buglet Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched: more accurate min_vruntime accounting Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched: weaken sync hint Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched: re-instate vruntime based wakeup preemption Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched: virtual time buddy preemption Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched: avg_vruntime Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-29 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-01 18:13 ` Fabio Checconi
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched: non-zero lag renice Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 17:47 ` Chris Friesen
2008-10-24 20:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 21:13 ` Chris Friesen
2008-10-24 9:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] use avg_vruntime for task placement Peter Zijlstra
2008-10-24 10:26 ` [PATCH 0/8] scheduler patches Ingo Molnar
2008-10-24 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1224844151.27946.1.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox