From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: David Smith <dsmith@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 15/21] ptrace changes
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:14:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1226049271.5830.28.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49133665.8090701@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 12:24 -0600, David Smith wrote:
> Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 11:14 -0600, David Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Is this correct, or should the 1st syscall argument be found in
> >> regs->orig_gpr2 by syscall_get_arguments()/syscall_set_arguments()?
> >
> > The question is when do syscall_get_arguments and syscall_set_arguments
> > functions get called? If they are called on a call chain that started
> > from do_syscall_trace_enter then we'd have to use orig_gpr2 instead of
> > gprs[2] but if the functions are not called via do_syscall_trace_enter
> > the first argument is located in grprs[2]. As far as I can see the sole
> > user of syscall_get_arguments is collect_syscall which is used to get
> > the registers of a blocked process. In this case the kernel call chain
> > does not include do_syscall_trace_enter, therefore the first argument is
> > in gprs[2], no?
>
> But, collect_syscall() also calls syscall_get_nr():
>
> *callno = syscall_get_nr(target, regs);
> if (*callno != -1L && maxargs > 0)
> syscall_get_arguments(target, regs, 0, maxargs, args);
>
> Both syscall_get_nr() *and* syscall_get_arguments() returning gprs[2]
> can't be right, can it?
Indeed, this cannot work. syscall_get_nr() requires that it is called on
a call chain that includes do_syscall_trace_enter(). And the fix for it
is not trivial. Probably the best would be to add another field to
pt_regs which contains the system call number. syscall_get_arguments()
could be improved to always use orig_gpr2 instead of grps[2] then it
doesn't matter when it is called. The problematic one is
syscall_set_arguments(), there it depends if grps[2] needs to be stored
of not. Hmm, this needs some thinking ..
Good spotting by the way :-)
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 8:33 [patch 00/21] s390 patches for the 2.6.28 merge window Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 01/21] qdio: speed up multicast traffic on full HiperSocket queue Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 02/21] cio: move device unregistration to dedicated work queue Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 03/21] cio: introduce purge function for /proc/cio_ignore Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 04/21] cio: Update cio_ignore documentation Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 05/21] cio: Exorcise cio_msg= from documentation Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 06/21] bus_id -> dev_name conversions Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 07/21] bus_id -> dev_set_name() changes Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 08/21] more bus_id -> dev_name conversions Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 09/21] Use s390_root_dev_* in kvm_virtio Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 10/21] bus_id ->dev_name() conversions in qdio Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 11/21] bus_id -> dev_set_name() for css and ccw busses Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 12/21] cio: inline assembly cleanup Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 13/21] qdio enhanced SIGA (iqdio) support Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 14/21] s390: use sys_pause for 31bit pause entry point Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 15/21] ptrace changes Martin Schwidefsky
2008-11-03 17:14 ` David Smith
2008-11-05 11:41 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-11-06 18:24 ` David Smith
2008-11-07 9:14 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2008-11-07 15:32 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 16/21] dcssblk: add >2G DCSSs support and stacked contiguous DCSSs support Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 17/21] nohz: Fix __udelay Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 18/21] Move private simple udelay function to arch/s390/lib/delay.c Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 19/21] dasd: fix message flood for unsolicited interrupts Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 20/21] xpram: per device block request queues Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 8:33 ` [patch 21/21] Add ioctl support for EMC Symmetrix Subsystem Control I/O Martin Schwidefsky
2008-10-01 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-01 11:17 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1226049271.5830.28.camel@localhost \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dsmith@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox