From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@hp.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, roland@redhat.com, adobriyan@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression introduced by - timers: fix itimer/many thread hang
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:26:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1226089574.31966.85.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1226081448.28191.64.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com>
OK, so how about going about this differently.
How about we group the threads per cpu, and appoint one the cpu-leader
and collect the per cpu sum in there.
Then, on tick time we sum the cpu-leaders to obtain the total.
This would require finding the cpu-leader for any particular cpu, which
for example, we could do by maintaining a rb-tree ordered on cpu. If you
find an entry, its the leader and you store a pointer to it, if its
empty, insert yourself.
We'd have to update this whenever a task migrates.
When the cpu-leader migrates it can hand off its sum to the cpu-leader
of the target cpu (assuming there is one, otherwise it will again be
cpu-leader).
The advantage is that the memory foot-print scales with nr_tasks and the
runtime cost is min(nr_tasks, nr_cpus) where nr_cpus is limited to the
cpus the process actually runs on, so this takes full advantage of
things like cpusets.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1224694989.8431.23.camel@oberon>
[not found] ` <1225132746.14792.13.camel@bobble.smo.corp.google.com>
[not found] ` <1225219114.24204.37.camel@oberon>
2008-11-06 1:58 ` regression introduced by - timers: fix itimer/many thread hang Frank Mayhar
2008-11-06 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 15:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-06 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 16:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-06 23:52 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-07 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-07 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-07 18:10 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-07 20:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-11-10 14:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-10 14:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-10 15:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-10 18:00 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-14 2:42 ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-14 16:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-11-17 14:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-11-17 18:16 ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-17 22:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-11-17 21:49 ` Roland McGrath
2008-11-11 0:20 ` Ingo Oeser
2008-11-11 13:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-21 18:42 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-21 19:26 ` Frank Mayhar
2008-11-23 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 8:46 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-24 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 12:32 ` Petr Tesarik
2008-11-24 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 16:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 16:31 ` [PATCH] revert: " Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-06 21:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 21:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-11-07 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-13 16:00 ` Doug Chapman
2008-11-13 16:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-14 14:10 ` Doug Chapman
[not found] <20081105191211.c0316b94.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2008-11-06 12:59 ` regression introduced by - " Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1226089574.31966.85.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=doug.chapman@hp.com \
--cc=fmayhar@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox