public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>,
	gernot.hillier@siemens.com, aacraid@adaptec.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com, Thomas Guyot-Sionnest <dermoth@aei.ca>,
	stable@kernel.org, Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
Subject: Re: aacraid: Adaptec 2200S support broken on x86_64 by commit 94cf6ba11b068b8a8f68a1e88bffb6827e92124b
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:20:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1226377257.5014.88.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081110152006.8982133b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 15:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:37:04 +0200
> Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hillier, Gernot wrote:
> > > Hi there!
> > >
> > > On our AMD64 machines equipped with old Adaptec 2200S controllers, we
> > > experienced a regression when updating to 2.6.25. The machines won't
> > > boot anymore (in a reasonable time), but instead spit out tons of those
> > > messages:
> > > aac_srb: aac_fib_send failed with status: 8195
> > >
> > > This is already reported in quite some places including LKML:
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/12/365
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450444
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453472
> > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/red-hat-31/aacsrb-aacfibsend-failed-with-status-8195-651078/
> > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-5077382.html?sid=a51c3a0fba6aa854c0b49b8fae5cc15a
> > >
> > > We found that this regression seems to be introduced by the bugfix
> > > "aacraid: fix driver failure with Dell PowerEdge
> > > Expandable RAID Controller 3/Di":
> > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=94cf6ba11b068b8a8f68a1e88bffb6827e92124b
> > >
> > > By simply removing the quirk flag for our controller, we could boot again.
> > >
> > > We did some quick stress tests on an AMD64bit machine with 16GB of RAM 
> > > and saw no problems after this change:
> > >
> > > diff -ur linux-2.6.25.11-0.1.ct1.orig/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c linux-2.6.25.11-0.1.ct1/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c
> > > --- linux-2.6.25.11-0.1.ct1.orig/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c	2008-09-15 16:07:14.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ linux-2.6.25.11-0.1.ct1/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c	2008-09-15 16:09:26.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
> > >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "catapult        ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* catapult */
> > >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "tomcat          ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* tomcat */
> > >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2120S   ", 1, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Adaptec 2120S (Crusader) */
> > > -	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2200S   ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Adaptec 2200S (Vulcan) */
> > > +	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2200S   ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG }, /* Adaptec 2200S (Vulcan) */
> > >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2200S   ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Adaptec 2200S (Vulcan-2m) */
> > >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "Legend  ", "Legend S220     ", 1, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Legend S220 (Legend Crusader) */
> > >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "Legend  ", "Legend S230     ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Legend S230 (Legend Vulcan) */
> > >
> > > Can this be safely changed/merged? Or is this the wrong way to fix it?
> > >
> > > Please note that we also have machines equipped with newer Adaptec 2230S
> > > controllers (PCI ID 9005:0286) which run perfectly with the current driver.
> > >
> > >   
> > Hi,
> > from what I read about this it seems to me that people are complaining also about issues with the 2120S Controller.
> > So if the patch is taken in this form the original patch should be extended to cover both controllers.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > diff -Naurp linux-2.6.18.i686b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c linux-2.6.18.i686p6/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c
> > --- linux-2.6.18.i686b/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c	2008-09-25 18:06:23.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.18.i686p6/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c	2008-10-03 12:12:06.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ static struct aac_driver_ident aac_drive
> >  	{ aac_rx_init, "percraid", "DELL    ", "PERCRAID        ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* PERC 3/Di (Boxster/PERC3DiB) */
> >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "catapult        ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* catapult */
> >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "tomcat          ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* tomcat */
> > -	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2120S   ", 1, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Adaptec 2120S (Crusader) */
> > -	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2200S   ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Adaptec 2200S (Vulcan) */
> > +	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2120S   ", 1, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG },		      /* Adaptec 2120S (Crusader) */
> > +	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2200S   ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG },		      /* Adaptec 2200S (Vulcan) */
> >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "ADAPTEC ", "Adaptec 2200S   ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Adaptec 2200S (Vulcan-2m) */
> >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "Legend  ", "Legend S220     ", 1, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Legend S220 (Legend Crusader) */
> >  	{ aac_rx_init, "aacraid",  "Legend  ", "Legend S230     ", 2, AAC_QUIRK_31BIT | AAC_QUIRK_34SG | AAC_QUIRK_SCSI_32 }, /* Legend S230 (Legend Vulcan) */
> > 
> > 
> 
> I added this to my tree with Tomas's title&changelog (thanks - I was
> about to whine about that).  Thanks Thomas for the reminder.  I tagged
> it as backportable to 2.6.25.x, 2.6.26.x and 2.6.27.x.

Could someone from Adaptec and Dell please verify that this is correct?
Mark Salyzyn no longer works there, but the aacraid@adaptec.com address
is supposed to still be working.

Thanks,

James



  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-11  4:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-17 14:03 aacraid: Adaptec 2200S support broken on x86_64 by commit 94cf6ba11b068b8a8f68a1e88bffb6827e92124b Hillier, Gernot
2008-10-07 13:37 ` Tomas Henzl
2008-10-07 15:48   ` Hillier, Gernot
2008-11-10 23:20   ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-11  4:20     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-11-11  4:54       ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-02 16:59         ` Matt Domsch
2008-11-11  9:56       ` Tomas Henzl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1226377257.5014.88.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
    --cc=aacraid@adaptec.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dermoth@aei.ca \
    --cc=gernot.hillier@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox