From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vatsa <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
David Collier-Brown <davecb@sun.com>,
Tim Connors <tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:09:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227406165.7685.20008.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081121082533.27075.12056.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:00 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> * Reverted sched MC level and CPU level fine tuning in v2.6.28-rc4 for
> now. These affect consolidation since SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE is
> removed. I will rework the tuning in the next iteration to
> selectively enable them at sched_mc=2
Looking forward to the next version.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-23 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-21 8:30 [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:30 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/7] sched: Framework for sched_mc/smt_power_savings=N Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 19:45 ` David Collier-Brown
2008-11-22 18:06 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] sched: favour lower logical cpu number for sched_mc balance Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/7] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-23 2:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-24 6:14 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] sched: bias task wakeups to preferred semi-idle packages Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/7] sched: activate active load balancing in new idle cpus Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/7] sched: re-tune balancing -- revert Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/7] sched: fine-tune SD_MC_INIT " Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-11-23 2:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1227406165.7685.20008.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davecb@sun.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox