From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754122AbYK0QVb (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:21:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753223AbYK0QVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:21:04 -0500 Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22]:63494 "EHLO viefep18-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753030AbYK0QVD (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:21:03 -0500 X-SourceIP: 213.46.9.244 Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 5/8] fsnotify: unified filesystem notification backend From: Peter Zijlstra To: Eric Paris Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malware-list@lists.printk.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org In-Reply-To: <20081125172117.17115.4875.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> References: <20081125171714.17115.82625.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <20081125172117.17115.4875.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:20:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1227802849.4454.1765.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 12:21 -0500, Eric Paris wrote: > +int fsnotify_check_notif_queue(struct fsnotify_group *group) > +{ > + mutex_lock(&group->notification_mutex); > + if (!list_empty(&group->notification_list)) > + return 1; > + mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex); > + return 0; > +} > +void fsnotify_clear_notif(struct fsnotify_group *group) > +{ > + struct fsnotify_event *event; > + > + while (fsnotify_check_notif_queue(group)) { > + event = get_event_from_notif(group); > + fsnotify_put_event(event); > + /* fsnotify_check_notif_queue() took this lock */ > + mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex); > + } > +} That is quite horrible, please just open code that to keep the locking symmetric.