From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755540AbYK1XXn (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:23:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752800AbYK1XXe (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:23:34 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:51115 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752720AbYK1XXe (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:23:34 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 5/8] fsnotify: unified filesystem notification backend From: Eric Paris To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malware-list@lists.printk.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org In-Reply-To: <1227802849.4454.1765.camel@twins> References: <20081125171714.17115.82625.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <20081125172117.17115.4875.stgit@paris.rdu.redhat.com> <1227802849.4454.1765.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:22:48 -0500 Message-Id: <1227914568.3393.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 17:20 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 12:21 -0500, Eric Paris wrote: > > +int fsnotify_check_notif_queue(struct fsnotify_group *group) > > +{ > > + mutex_lock(&group->notification_mutex); > > + if (!list_empty(&group->notification_list)) > > + return 1; > > + mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex); > > + return 0; > > +} > > > +void fsnotify_clear_notif(struct fsnotify_group *group) > > +{ > > + struct fsnotify_event *event; > > + > > + while (fsnotify_check_notif_queue(group)) { > > + event = get_event_from_notif(group); > > + fsnotify_put_event(event); > > + /* fsnotify_check_notif_queue() took this lock */ > > + mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex); > > + } > > +} > > That is quite horrible, please just open code that to keep the locking > symmetric. While horrible, I use fsnotify_check_notif_queue in my fsnotify (not in this series as this only includes dnotify) has wait_event_interruptible(group->notification_waitq, fanotify_check_notif_queue(group)); So I wouldn't know how to open code that... I can open code this instance, but it's going to mean redoing all of that other code to handle having thing not be present when we return. Since I didn't submit that as well I guess I'm not allowed to use it as a reason...