From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2008-12-01-19-41: early exception (page fault -- deref of 0x20)
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:29:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228260573.3196.171.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4935C03A.7030603@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 00:09 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while writing out warning about empty mtrr (or any other in the early stage),
> I'm getting this:
> PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:ffffffff8025be26 error 0 cr2 20
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.28-rc6-mm1_64 #484
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff80770195>] early_idt_handler+0x55/0x69
> [<ffffffff8025be26>] ? getnstimeofday+0x46/0xc0
> [<ffffffff80258a81>] ktime_get_real+0x11/0x50
> [<ffffffff803aa8d1>] seed_std_data+0x11/0x30
> [<ffffffff8020ff60>] ? show_trace+0x10/0x20
> [<ffffffff803aa900>] seed_random_pools+0x10/0x30
> [<ffffffff8023dda9>] init_oops_id+0x9/0x40
> [<ffffffff8023dde9>] print_oops_end_marker+0x9/0x20
> [<ffffffff8023dfed>] warn_slowpath+0x9d/0xd0
> [<ffffffff802595e4>] ? up+0x34/0x50
> [<ffffffff8023e77d>] ? release_console_sem+0x1bd/0x210
> [<ffffffff80592c38>] ? printk+0x3c/0x44
> [<ffffffff80776e67>] mtrr_trim_uncached_memory+0x166/0x390
> [<ffffffff8077fca0>] ? early_gart_iommu_check+0xaf/0x2a7
> [<ffffffff80772574>] setup_arch+0x3ec/0x6a8
> [<ffffffff80770adf>] start_kernel+0x65/0x3c6
> [<ffffffff8077027d>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x7d/0x89
> [<ffffffff80770384>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xd8/0xdf
> RIP 0x10
>
> The clock is still null in kernel/time/timekeeping.c.
>
> This one is to blame:
> random-add-a-way-to-get-some-random-bits-into-the-entropy-pools-early-on.patch
Nice. I didn't like that patch anyway.
Seems to me we really need to simplify all our startup dependencies.
Some things should -always- work. Time is one of them, random number
generation may be another, memory allocation ought to be one as well.
So I think:
a) we need to come up with a solution/rule for early ktime faulting
b) the RNG should initialize itself on demand
c) seeding the RNG should include a (void *, len)
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-02 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-02 23:09 mmotm 2008-12-01-19-41: early exception (page fault -- deref of 0x20) Jiri Slaby
2008-12-02 23:29 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2008-12-02 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-02 23:42 ` Matt Mackall
2008-12-02 23:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-03 17:07 ` Matt Mackall
2008-12-03 17:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-03 13:00 ` Jiri Kosina
2008-12-22 12:04 ` Jiri Slaby
2008-12-22 12:25 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228260573.3196.171.camel@calx \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox