* [PATCH] relay: When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
@ 2008-11-29 15:38 roel kluin
2008-12-02 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: roel kluin @ 2008-11-29 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
UNTESTED! is this the way to go?
diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c
index 32b0bef..c9d62e5 100644
--- a/kernel/relay.c
+++ b/kernel/relay.c
@@ -1220,7 +1220,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
unsigned int flags,
int *nonpad_ret)
{
- unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages, ret;
+ unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages;
+ ssize_t ret;
struct rchan_buf *rbuf = in->private_data;
unsigned int subbuf_size = rbuf->chan->subbuf_size;
uint64_t pos = (uint64_t) *ppos;
@@ -1289,7 +1290,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
if (!spd.nr_pages)
return 0;
- ret = *nonpad_ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
+ ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
+ *nonpad_ret = ret;
if (ret < 0 || ret < total_len)
return ret;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] relay: When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
2008-11-29 15:38 [PATCH] relay: When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value roel kluin
@ 2008-12-02 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03 4:29 ` Tom Zanussi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-12-02 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: roel kluin; +Cc: linux-kernel, Tom Zanussi, Tom Zanussi, Jens Axboe
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:38:06 -0500
roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> wrote:
> When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> ---
> UNTESTED! is this the way to go?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c
> index 32b0bef..c9d62e5 100644
> --- a/kernel/relay.c
> +++ b/kernel/relay.c
> @@ -1220,7 +1220,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> unsigned int flags,
> int *nonpad_ret)
> {
> - unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages, ret;
> + unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages;
> + ssize_t ret;
> struct rchan_buf *rbuf = in->private_data;
> unsigned int subbuf_size = rbuf->chan->subbuf_size;
> uint64_t pos = (uint64_t) *ppos;
> @@ -1289,7 +1290,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> if (!spd.nr_pages)
> return 0;
>
> - ret = *nonpad_ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> + ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> + *nonpad_ret = ret;
> if (ret < 0 || ret < total_len)
> return ret;
>
Yeah, this code needs help. subbuf_splice_actor() returns `int', but
carefully calculates and returns an unsigned type.
I suspect that quite a bit of code in there (including
relay_file_splice_read()) should be gone through and have its choice of
types reviewed and fixed. Probably by converting things to ssize_t.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] relay: When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
2008-12-02 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-12-03 4:29 ` Tom Zanussi
2008-12-03 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Zanussi @ 2008-12-03 4:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: roel kluin, linux-kernel, Tom Zanussi, Jens Axboe
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:38:06 -0500
> roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > UNTESTED! is this the way to go?
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c
> > index 32b0bef..c9d62e5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/relay.c
> > +++ b/kernel/relay.c
> > @@ -1220,7 +1220,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> > unsigned int flags,
> > int *nonpad_ret)
> > {
> > - unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages, ret;
> > + unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages;
> > + ssize_t ret;
> > struct rchan_buf *rbuf = in->private_data;
> > unsigned int subbuf_size = rbuf->chan->subbuf_size;
> > uint64_t pos = (uint64_t) *ppos;
> > @@ -1289,7 +1290,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> > if (!spd.nr_pages)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - ret = *nonpad_ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> > + ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> > + *nonpad_ret = ret;
> > if (ret < 0 || ret < total_len)
> > return ret;
> >
>
> Yeah, this code needs help. subbuf_splice_actor() returns `int', but
> carefully calculates and returns an unsigned type.
>
> I suspect that quite a bit of code in there (including
> relay_file_splice_read()) should be gone through and have its choice of
> types reviewed and fixed. Probably by converting things to ssize_t.
>
>
And maybe generic_file_splice_read() too, from whence it came. Speaking
of which, is there some reason why this patch:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0810.3/0094.html
never got picked up?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] relay: When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
2008-12-03 4:29 ` Tom Zanussi
@ 2008-12-03 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03 5:19 ` Tom Zanussi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-12-03 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Zanussi; +Cc: roel kluin, linux-kernel, Tom Zanussi, Jens Axboe
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:29:51 -0600 Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:38:06 -0500
> > roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > UNTESTED! is this the way to go?
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c
> > > index 32b0bef..c9d62e5 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/relay.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/relay.c
> > > @@ -1220,7 +1220,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> > > unsigned int flags,
> > > int *nonpad_ret)
> > > {
> > > - unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages, ret;
> > > + unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages;
> > > + ssize_t ret;
> > > struct rchan_buf *rbuf = in->private_data;
> > > unsigned int subbuf_size = rbuf->chan->subbuf_size;
> > > uint64_t pos = (uint64_t) *ppos;
> > > @@ -1289,7 +1290,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> > > if (!spd.nr_pages)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - ret = *nonpad_ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> > > + ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> > > + *nonpad_ret = ret;
> > > if (ret < 0 || ret < total_len)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, this code needs help. subbuf_splice_actor() returns `int', but
> > carefully calculates and returns an unsigned type.
> >
> > I suspect that quite a bit of code in there (including
> > relay_file_splice_read()) should be gone through and have its choice of
> > types reviewed and fixed. Probably by converting things to ssize_t.
> >
> >
>
> And maybe generic_file_splice_read() too, from whence it came.
sure.
> Speaking
> of which, is there some reason why this patch:
>
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0810.3/0094.html
>
> never got picked up?
>
Incompetence I guess.
Damn man, that's your third email address :(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] relay: When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
2008-12-03 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-12-03 5:19 ` Tom Zanussi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tom Zanussi @ 2008-12-03 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: roel kluin, linux-kernel, Jens Axboe
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 20:37 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:29:51 -0600 Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 10:38:06 -0500
> > > roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > UNTESTED! is this the way to go?
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c
> > > > index 32b0bef..c9d62e5 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/relay.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/relay.c
> > > > @@ -1220,7 +1220,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> > > > unsigned int flags,
> > > > int *nonpad_ret)
> > > > {
> > > > - unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages, ret;
> > > > + unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages;
> > > > + ssize_t ret;
> > > > struct rchan_buf *rbuf = in->private_data;
> > > > unsigned int subbuf_size = rbuf->chan->subbuf_size;
> > > > uint64_t pos = (uint64_t) *ppos;
> > > > @@ -1289,7 +1290,8 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
> > > > if (!spd.nr_pages)
> > > > return 0;
> > > >
> > > > - ret = *nonpad_ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> > > > + ret = splice_to_pipe(pipe, &spd);
> > > > + *nonpad_ret = ret;
> > > > if (ret < 0 || ret < total_len)
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, this code needs help. subbuf_splice_actor() returns `int', but
> > > carefully calculates and returns an unsigned type.
> > >
> > > I suspect that quite a bit of code in there (including
> > > relay_file_splice_read()) should be gone through and have its choice of
> > > types reviewed and fixed. Probably by converting things to ssize_t.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > And maybe generic_file_splice_read() too, from whence it came.
>
> sure.
>
> > Speaking
> > of which, is there some reason why this patch:
> >
> > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0810.3/0094.html
> >
> > never got picked up?
> >
>
> Incompetence I guess.
No problem, thanks for finally picking it up. :-)
>
> Damn man, that's your third email address :(
Yeah, the purpose of the gmail address is to avoid that but I forget to
use it - will try to be less careless in the future. ;-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-03 5:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-29 15:38 [PATCH] relay: When unsigned ret cannot store a negative value roel kluin
2008-12-02 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03 4:29 ` Tom Zanussi
2008-12-03 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-03 5:19 ` Tom Zanussi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox