From: Geoffrey McRae <geoff@rabidhost.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Nick Andrew <nick@nick-andrew.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New Security Features, Please Comment
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:50:40 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228449040.14193.14.camel@lappy.spacevs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95180.1228448127@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
> Thus providing me with a way to DoS your webserver by sticking all your
> server processes into a sleep-forever... :)
Yeah, I realise that, its not the problem I am trying to solve though.
>
> You're also overlooking the fact that the malicious code could do something
> like this:
>
> /* send the parent something that makes it *think* the request finished */
> printf("We're all done now\n");
> while (getpid()) msleep (1);
>
Hmm, your right, there has to be a way to overcome all these issues
without having the fork overhead.
I have been toying with an alternate solution of allowing the parent
process to chroot & re-chroot it's children, but even that has the same
problem.
A hack to stop that would be to make getuid... etc, fudge their values
by always returning a constant value to the child, but it is an ugly way
to do this and would involve making stat lie about the ownership of
files too, and anything else that could be used to determine the real
uid or gid.
It seems that solving this issue is alot more complex then I first
envisioned.
Anyone else have any ideas of a fast, efficient and secure way to
accomplish this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-05 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-02 23:28 New Security Features, Please Comment Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-03 0:24 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-03 0:53 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-03 1:44 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-03 2:11 ` David Newall
2008-12-03 2:55 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-12-03 4:02 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-03 4:35 ` Peter Teoh
2008-12-03 5:02 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-03 6:54 ` David Newall
2008-12-03 10:29 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-03 12:42 ` Nick Andrew
2008-12-03 12:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-03 22:44 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-03 23:08 ` Alan Cox
2008-12-03 23:27 ` Peter Teoh
2008-12-03 23:40 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-04 21:56 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-12-04 22:30 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-05 3:35 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-12-05 3:44 ` Nick Andrew
2008-12-05 3:50 ` Geoffrey McRae [this message]
2008-12-05 4:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-12-03 23:39 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2008-12-04 0:00 ` Geoffrey McRae
2008-12-04 0:22 ` Peter Teoh
2008-12-04 0:08 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228449040.14193.14.camel@lappy.spacevs.com \
--to=geoff@rabidhost.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=htmldeveloper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick@nick-andrew.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox