public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix another race when reading /proc/sched_debug
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:48:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229258890.17130.9.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4944754F.8050503@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 10:54 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > i merged it up in tip/master, could you please check whether it's ok?
> > 
> 
> Sorry, though this patch avoids accessing a half-created cgroup, but I found
> current code may access a cgroup which has been destroyed.
> 
> The simplest fix is to take cgroup_lock() before for_each_leaf_cfs_rq.
> 
> Could you revert this patch and apply the following new one? My box has
> survived for 16 hours with it applied.
> 
> ==========
> 
> From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:53:28 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix another race when reading /proc/sched_debug
> 
> I fixed an oops with the following commit:
> 
> | commit 24eb089950ce44603b30a3145a2c8520e2b55bb1
> | Author: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> | Date:   Thu Nov 6 12:53:32 2008 -0800
> |
> |    cgroups: fix invalid cgrp->dentry before cgroup has been completely removed
> |
> |    This fixes an oops when reading /proc/sched_debug.
> 
> The above commit fixed a race that reading /proc/sched_debug may access
> NULL cgrp->dentry if a cgroup is being removed (via cgroup_rmdir), but
> hasn't been destroyed (via cgroup_diput).
> 
> But I found there's another different race, in that reading sched_debug
> may access a cgroup which is being created or has been destroyed, and thus
> dereference NULL cgrp->dentry!
> 
> task_group is added to the global list while the cgroup is being created,
> and is removed from the global list while the cgroup is under destruction.
> So running through the list should be protected by cgroup_lock(), if
> cgroup data will be accessed (here by calling cgroup_path).

Can't we detect a dead task-group and skip those instead of adding this
global lock?

> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_fair.c |    6 ++++++
>  kernel/sched_rt.c   |    6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 98345e4..8b2965b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1737,9 +1737,15 @@ static void print_cfs_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Hold cgroup_lock() to avoid calling cgroup_path() with
> +	 * invalid cgroup.
> +	 */
> +	cgroup_lock();
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(cpu_rq(cpu), cfs_rq)
>  		print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, cfs_rq);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	cgroup_unlock();
>  }
>  #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index d9ba9d5..e84480d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1538,9 +1538,15 @@ static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Hold cgroup_lock() to avoid calling cgroup_path() with
> +	 * invalid cgroup.
> +	 */
> +	cgroup_lock();
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, cpu_rq(cpu))
>  		print_rt_rq(m, cpu, rt_rq);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	cgroup_unlock();
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-14 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-12  9:53 [PATCH] sched: fix another race when reading /proc/sched_debug Li Zefan
2008-12-12 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-14  2:54   ` Li Zefan
2008-12-14 12:48     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2008-12-15  1:25       ` Li Zefan
2008-12-15  8:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-15  9:51           ` Li Zefan
2008-12-15 10:43             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-15 11:08               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-16  5:48                 ` Li Zefan
2008-12-16  6:59                   ` Li Zefan
2008-12-16  9:41               ` Paul Menage
2008-12-16 12:42                 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-16 12:55                   ` Li Zefan
2008-12-16 18:35                     ` Paul Menage
     [not found]       ` <6599ad830812141347k5d7e7e08vfc17855ea0ac981c@mail.gmail.com>
2008-12-15  1:39         ` Li Zefan
2008-12-15  1:50           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-15  2:11             ` Li Zefan
2008-12-16  9:23             ` Paul Menage
2008-12-16  9:39               ` Li Zefan
2008-12-19  4:37       ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-19 14:06         ` Paul Menage
2008-12-16  8:01     ` Li Zefan
2008-12-16 12:23       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-12 11:38 ` Bharata B Rao
2008-12-13  8:22   ` Li Zefan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1229258890.17130.9.camel@lappy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox