Re: [RFC PATCH 02/12] net: infrastructure for hardware time stamping

Herbert Xu
2008-12-15T21:53:44Z

Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com> wrote:
> @@ -305,6 +406,8 @@ struct sk_buff {
> ipvs_property:1,
> peeked:1,
> nf_trace:1;
> + /* not all of the bits in optional are used */
> + __u8 optional;
> __be16 protocol;

You do reliase that this is going to grow the sk_buff by at least
4 bytes and not 1?

Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt