From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: random.c changes for sparse irq_desc are crap
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:40:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1230766826.19620.150.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <495BFB48.8080506@kernel.org>
On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 15:07 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > I just noticed you merged a change that pointlessly converts two
> > random.c functions into ugly random.h inlines without going through the
> > maintainer.
> >
> > I also don't like the look of the newly-introduced sparse variants of
> > these functions. Failure to find an irq descriptor in
> > get_timer_rand_state is a BUG_ON should-never-happen sort of condition,
> > not something to silently ignore. Letting the code try to dereference
> > NULL is preferred here: we'll actually be able to find and fix the
> > broken driver that's throwing around meaningless irq vectors.
> >
> > Throwing away the timer_state pointer in the set_timer_rand_state
> > function is similarly bogus in addition to being a memory leak.
> >
> > Please fix this up.
> >
>
> want something like this?
Not quite.
First, please turn these back into normal functions in random.c.
Inlining functions is generally discouraged these days unless you have a
good reason and numbers to back it up.
Second, as I tried to explain above, BUG_ON(!desc) is doing very little
that the subsequent desc->timer_rand_state wouldn't already do
(generating a traceback). In cases where dereferencing NULL should never
happen, it's preferable to not add the extra check and just let the oops
happen. We'll still get a backtrace if anything ever goes wrong, but we
won't have wasted any code space or CPU cycles when it doesn't.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-31 23:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-31 18:29 random.c changes for sparse irq_desc are crap Matt Mackall
2008-12-31 23:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-12-31 23:40 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2009-01-01 0:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-01 9:31 ` Matt Mackall
2009-01-02 15:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03 8:06 ` [PATCH] sparseirq: move set/get_timer_rand_state back to .c Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1230766826.19620.150.camel@calx \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox