[PATCH] asm-s390/posix_types.h: drop __USE_ALL usage

[PATCH] asm-s390/posix_types.h: drop __USE_ALL usage

[Mike Frysinger]

Bring s390 in line with all the other ports.  Not sure how s390 missed
this change as all the other arches were being updated ...

Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
CC: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
CC: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
CC: linux390@de.ibm.com
CC: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/posix_types.h |    4 ----
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/posix_types.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/posix_types.h
index 397d93f..8cc113f 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/posix_types.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/posix_types.h
@@ -68,11 +68,7 @@ typedef unsigned short __kernel_old_dev_t;
 #endif /* __s390x__ */
 
 typedef struct {
-#if defined(__KERNEL__) || defined(__USE_ALL)
         int     val[2];
-#else                        /* !defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(__USE_ALL)*/
-        int     __val[2];
-#endif                       /* !defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(__USE_ALL)*/
 } __kernel_fsid_t;
 
 
-- 
1.6.0.6

Re: [PATCH] asm-s390/posix_types.h: drop __USE_ALL usage

[Martin Schwidefsky]

Hi Mike,

On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 02:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Bring s390 in line with all the other ports.  Not sure how s390 missed
> this change as all the other arches were being updated ...

Should I carry the patch via git390?

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

Re: [PATCH] asm-s390/posix_types.h: drop __USE_ALL usage

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 433 bytes --]

On Friday 02 January 2009 03:50:27 Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 02:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Bring s390 in line with all the other ports.  Not sure how s390 missed
> > this change as all the other arches were being updated ...
>
> Should I carry the patch via git390?

i dont know what "git390" is, but it makes no difference to me how it gets 
merged.  whatever is easiest for people.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] asm-s390/posix_types.h: drop __USE_ALL usage

[Martin Schwidefsky]

On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 03:55 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 02 January 2009 03:50:27 Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 02:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Bring s390 in line with all the other ports.  Not sure how s390 missed
> > > this change as all the other arches were being updated ...
> >
> > Should I carry the patch via git390?
> 
> i dont know what "git390" is, but it makes no difference to me how it gets 
> merged.  whatever is easiest for people.

git390 == git://git390.osdl.marist.edu/pub/scm/linux-2.6.git

I'll add the patch to the queue for the next s390 update.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.