public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:00:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1231081200.17224.44.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1230981761.27180.10.camel@marge.simson.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2145 bytes --]

On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 12:22 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 15:46 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
> > * Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> [2009-01-03 08:29:25]:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 23:16 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Mike, would you be interesting in having a look at sched_mc=2 as a 
> > > > kernel-wide default - and give it your blessing if you find it to be a net 
> > > > improvement for the various performance and interactivity tests you do?
> > > 
> > > Sure.
> > 
> > Thanks Mike and Ingo.  I will be glad to help with test and benchmarks
> > on the platforms that I have access.
> > 
> > I am presently working on sysbench.
> 
> The testing I can do is rather severely limited since I have only one
> Q6600.  I butchered mc_capable() to use what I can though, ie see if
> SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE still harms tbench and mysql+oltp.  I think that's
> about all I can do on my wee box.

I do not see any difference for tbench, results are within jitter.  I do
for mysql+oltp, and the test results are fairly strange.

If you take a peek at the attached chart: the 2.6.26.8 data is with
scalability backports/fixes.  That's where our 29-to-be should be.
Domain tunings in this kernel are identical to 28/29 stock as well.

Note that there is no knee at 8 clients.  If I turn SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE
on in 26+backports, peak drops a tad, and that knee re-appears, just as
before we turned the thing off.  Throughput after the knee also drops a
tad, nearly to the point where tip+sched_mc=2 now _comes up to_, and it
definitely is SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE making the difference.  IOW, what used
to be a loser, and still is a loser in 26+fixes, is now a winner in tip
after the knee which should not be there.  Seems something else has
changed, re-introducing the knee, and cutting throughput a tad.

(The hefty difference at the very end I knew about.  SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE
helps considerably when mysql is very thoroughly jammed up on itself)

When I look at that chart, it looks almost like SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE is
partially offsetting some other problem.

I haven't done any interactivity testing yet.

	-Mike

[-- Attachment #2: zzz.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 75980 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-04 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-18 17:55 [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] sched: convert BALANCE_FOR_xx_POWER to inline functions Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] sched: Framework for sched_mc/smt_power_savings=N Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] sched: favour lower logical cpu number for sched_mc balance Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-19 21:55   ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:19     ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:27       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:31         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:38           ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20  4:36     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20  4:44       ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-20  7:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20 10:02         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:36           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:56             ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-21  8:46               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched: bias task wakeups to preferred semi-idle packages Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:11   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched: activate active load balancing in new idle cpus Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched: add SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE at MC and CPU level for sched_mc>0 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched: idle_balance() does not call load_balance_newidle() Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 20:17     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19  8:29     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19  8:24   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19 13:34   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-29 23:43 ` MinChan Kim
2008-12-30  2:48   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30  6:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  6:44       ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30  7:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 18:07       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02  7:26         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02 22:16           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03  7:29             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-03 10:16               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-03 11:22                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 15:00                   ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-01-04 18:19                     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-04 19:52                       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05  3:20                         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-05  4:40                           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05  6:36                             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 15:19                               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06  9:31                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 15:07                                   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-06 17:48                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 18:45                                       ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-07  8:59                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 11:26                                           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 14:36                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 15:35                                               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-08  8:06                                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-08 17:46                                                   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-09  6:00                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 14:54                             ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-30 17:31     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1231081200.17224.44.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox