From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.8 scheduler bug - threads not being scheduled for long periods
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:36:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1231227386.11687.23.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105230218.GC20319@sgi.com>
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 17:02 -0600, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> Peter,
>
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 04:36:21PM -0600, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> > And sure enough, the rq->clock is sometimes going backwards.
> >
> > The comment for sched_clock() in arch/ia64/kernel/head.S:
> > * Return a CPU-local timestamp in nano-seconds. This timestamp is
> > * NOT synchronized across CPUs its return value must never be
> > * compared against the values returned on another CPU. The usage in
> > * kernel/sched.c ensures that.
> >
> > We will try this with CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCKS.
> >
>
> The testcase does indeed run with CONFIG_HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCKS configured.
Ok, glad it worked out, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 17:56 2.6.27.8 scheduler bug - threads not being scheduled for long periods Dimitri Sivanich
2009-01-05 18:44 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-01-05 18:51 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-01-05 18:59 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-01-14 22:34 ` kenneth johansson
2009-01-05 20:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 21:54 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-01-05 22:36 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-01-05 23:02 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2009-01-06 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1231227386.11687.23.camel@twins \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox