Re: [PATCH 08/10] MAINTAINERS - Add FTRACE git

[Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>]

On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 14:59 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:28:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index ceeeb8c..6e051c3 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -2189,6 +2189,7 @@ F:	fs/freevxfs/
> >  FTRACE
> >  P:	Steven Rostedt
> >  M:	rostedt@goodmis.org
> > +T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git
> >  S:	Maintained
> >  F:	Documentation/ftrace.txt
> >  F:	arch/*/*/*/ftrace.h
> 
> This sort of thing only makes sense if you include the topic branch for
> the tree in question. While it is true that ftrace development happens in
> this tree, people looking at ftrace may not want to sort through the
> hundreds of unrelated topic branches in the process. I say this as
> someone that does not want to sort through hundreds of unrelated topic
> branches in search of ftrace code ;-)

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=heads

Is the correct topic branch for ftrace auto-ftrace-next?

maybe:

T:	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git auto-ftrace-next

No idea what's right here.  I had some private emails
with Steven Rostedt about a git tree.  He suggested
to use tip.

Steven?  Suggestions?