Re: [2.6.29-rc2] Inconsistent lock state on resume in hres_timers_resume

Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-18T15:39:53Z

On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 16:41 +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> [17854.688347] =================================
> [17854.688347] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [17854.688347] 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1
> [17854.688347] ---------------------------------
> [17854.688347] inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
> [17854.688347] pm-suspend/18240 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
> [17854.688347] (&cpu_base->lock){++..}, at: [<c0136fcc>] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
> [17854.688347] [<c01443cd>] __lock_acquire+0x79d/0x1930
> [17854.688347] [<c01455bc>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c03092e5>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0136e61>] hrtimer_run_queues+0x31/0x140
> [17854.688347] [<c0128d98>] run_local_timers+0x8/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c0128dd3>] update_process_times+0x23/0x60
> [17854.688347] [<c013e274>] tick_periodic+0x24/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c013e2e2>] tick_handle_periodic+0x12/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0104e24>] timer_interrupt+0x14/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c01607b9>] handle_IRQ_event+0x29/0x60
> [17854.688347] [<c0161c59>] handle_level_irq+0x69/0xe0
> [17854.688347] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> [17854.688347] irq event stamp: 55771
> [17854.688347] hardirqs last enabled at (55771): [<c0309125>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
> [17854.688347] hardirqs last disabled at (55770): [<c0309419>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x19/0x80
> [17854.688347] softirqs last enabled at (54836): [<c0124f54>] __do_softirq+0xc4/0x110
> [17854.688347] softirqs last disabled at (54831): [<c01049ae>] do_softirq+0x8e/0xe0
> [17854.688347]
> [17854.688347] other info that might help us debug this:
> [17854.688347] 3 locks held by pm-suspend/18240:
> [17854.688347] #0: (&buffer->mutex){--..}, at: [<c01dd4c5>] sysfs_write_file+0x25/0x100
> [17854.688347] #1: (pm_mutex){--..}, at: [<c015056f>] enter_state+0x4f/0x140
> [17854.688347] #2: (dpm_list_mtx){--..}, at: [<c027880f>] device_pm_lock+0xf/0x20
> [17854.688347]
> [17854.688347] stack backtrace:
> [17854.688347] Pid: 18240, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1
> [17854.688347] Call Trace:
> [17854.688347] [<c0306248>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c0141fac>] print_usage_bug+0x16c/0x1d0
> [17854.688347] [<c0142bcf>] mark_lock+0x8bf/0xc90
> [17854.688347] [<c0106b8f>] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40
> [17854.688347] [<c01441b0>] __lock_acquire+0x580/0x1930
> [17854.688347] [<c030916d>] ? _spin_unlock+0x1d/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c0106b8f>] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40
> [17854.688347] [<c013dd38>] ? clockevents_program_event+0x98/0x160
> [17854.688347] [<c0142fe8>] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x90
> [17854.688347] [<c0309125>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
> [17854.688347] [<c0143229>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x139/0x190
> [17854.688347] [<c014328b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
> [17854.688347] [<c01455bc>] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c0136fcc>] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] [<c03092e5>] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0136fcc>] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] [<c0136fcc>] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0
> [17854.688347] [<c013711a>] hres_timers_resume+0xa/0x10
> [17854.688347] [<c013aa8e>] timekeeping_resume+0xee/0x150
> [17854.688347] [<c0273384>] __sysdev_resume+0x14/0x50
> [17854.688347] [<c0273407>] sysdev_resume+0x47/0x80
> [17854.688347] [<c02791ab>] device_power_up+0xb/0x20
> [17854.688347] [<c015043f>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xcf/0x150
> [17854.688347] [<c0150c2f>] ? freeze_processes+0x3f/0x90
> [17854.688347] [<c0150614>] enter_state+0xf4/0x140
> [17854.688347] [<c01506dd>] state_store+0x7d/0xc0
> [17854.688347] [<c0150660>] ? state_store+0x0/0xc0
> [17854.688347] [<c0202da4>] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30
> [17854.688347] [<c01dd53c>] sysfs_write_file+0x9c/0x100
> [17854.688347] [<c019916c>] vfs_write+0x9c/0x160
> [17854.688347] [<c0103494>] ? restore_nocheck_notrace+0x0/0xe
> [17854.688347] [<c01dd4a0>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100
> [17854.688347] [<c01992ed>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
> [17854.688347] [<c0103371>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31

Not sure what caused this to trigger, but it looks like
timekeeping_resume() isn't called with IRQs disabled (and the code
doesn't seem to expect that since it uses write_seqlock_irqsave).

hres_timers_resume() however calls retrigger_next_event() which does
require IRQs disabled and doesn't do that.

Like said, I'm not sure what caused this since the code in question
doesn't seem to have changed since April 2007.

Anyway, does the below patch cure trouble?
---
Subject: hrtimer: fix irq recursion deadlock

retrigger_next_event() requires IRQs disabled, provide that for the
resume callback.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index 2c40ee8..430103d 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -614,8 +614,12 @@ void clock_was_set(void)
*/
void hres_timers_resume(void)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
/* Retrigger the CPU local events: */
+ local_irq_save(flags);
retrigger_next_event(NULL);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}

/*