public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lockdep and debug objects together are broken?
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:50:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232538602.4847.158.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090121114229.GA10606@elte.hu>

On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:42 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> So by the time you'd rearm, there's a lot of tasks with no proper locking 
> state built up. We might be able to re-arm via stop_machine_run perhaps.

Won't work either, kstopmachine only preempts everybody. We'd require
something stronger.

What we need is a point where there's guaranteed no locks held, for
regular tasks that would be a trip to userspace and back, but for kernel
tasks that's a bit harder -- does the freezer stuff guarantee this?

Supposing we have such a point for all tasks, what you then do is wipe
all lock state and rig a trigger to start tracking lock state once you
passed through the point.




  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-21 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-20  8:55 lockdep and debug objects together are broken? Nick Piggin
2009-01-20 21:11 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-01-21  7:19   ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-21 11:42     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-21 11:50       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-01-21 11:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-21 11:54       ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-21 11:57         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1232538602.4847.158.camel@laptop \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox