From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757598AbZAVU37 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:29:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752362AbZAVU3v (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:29:51 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:50360 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751868AbZAVU3u (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:29:50 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/19] lockdep: annotate reclaim context (__GFP_NOFS) From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1232653234.4890.135.camel@laptop> References: <20090122173701.674448070@chello.nl> <20090122174052.061744802@chello.nl> <1232653234.4890.135.camel@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:29:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1232656187.4890.136.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 20:40 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > + return; > > + if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled())) > > + return; > > + > > + mark_held_locks(curr, RECLAIM_FS); > > +} > > Not quite seeing how this happens though... > > [ 6.998258] WARNING: at /usr/src/linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c:2266 > lockdep_trace_alloc+0x58/0x69() Doh, its getting there without __GFP_WAIT...