From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Pawel Dziekonski <dzieko@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: CPU scheduler question/problem
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:40:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232725219.4826.131.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cd4df870901221334n7e242e79ka961f899c03c70cb@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 22:34 +0100, Pawel Dziekonski wrote:
> question: is there a way to better balance processes over different
> cores and do it automagically?
Hard, the load-balancing code is a bunch of heuristics that work 'well'
for most of the things.
The pipe workload you mentioned has would behave that way because pipes
'assume' a produces/consumer behaviour, and thus are more likely to
place both tasks on the same cpu -- but will eventually pull them apart
if they want to run concurrently.
You might enable SCHED_DEBUG=y and try
echo NO_SYNC_WAKEUPS > /debug/sched_features
For that particular load.
About your quantum chemistry application -- you say they share a
workload, does that mean they synchronize a lot on locks? If so, the
scheduler might, at times of serialization, think it is a
produces/consumer load and move tasks together, and then later, when
they run independently, move them apart again.
I'm afraid you'll have to share a bit more of how your application works
in order to get a more informed answer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-23 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-22 21:34 CPU scheduler question/problem Pawel Dziekonski
2009-01-23 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-01-26 13:48 ` Pawel Dziekonski
2009-01-26 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-26 22:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 16:04 ` Pawel Dziekonski
[not found] <2cd4df870902031544h5f0b4e59na2c0a0804125dd9a@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <2cd4df870902040600r2974362r4e9eabf2608b05b4@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090204142455.GE4411@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <2cd4df870902040751l19332473ic36e2642723f5ec8@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090205192502.GC27422@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <2cd4df870902051514k31582fbal11113b37b756dda0@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1233914595.10894.1.camel@laptop>
[not found] ` <20090206155311.GQ18368@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <2cd4df870902061444p335a9433l73fe6e820ec11c6@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20090209122538.GI17782@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <2cd4df870902091056v7287e53fx8e7c8c5599b856b3@mail.gmail.com>
2009-02-11 9:06 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1232725219.4826.131.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=dzieko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox