From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frank Mehnert <Frank.Mehnert@Sun.COM>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PFs on pages pinned with get_user_pages()
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:28:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233232094.4495.45.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901290905.10966.frank.mehnert@sun.com>
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 09:05 +0100, Frank Mehnert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please could someone explain me under which circumstances a pagefault,
> either generated from kernel code or from userland code, can occur on
> pages which are pinned with get_user_pages()?
>
> So far my understanding was that this can _never_ happen but I seems to
> be wrong. Under high memory pressure I get PFs on such pages raised from
> kernel code and the PFs are handled by do_swap_page(). When this happens,
> page_count is 3 but page_mapped() returns false.
Under memory pressure the page reclaim will first unmap the physical
page from the virtual address range, and then try to free it.
Obviously the freeing bit fails if you hold a reference to it, but the
unmap will work.
After that, userspace will have to (minor) fault the stuff back in.
Also, that same page-reclaim, or pdflush might decide to write out dirty
data, which will also result in (minor) faults when userspace will
re-dirty the pages.
Having a page reference will only avoid the physical page from getting
removed from its current mapping (and thereby also pins the mapping).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 8:05 PFs on pages pinned with get_user_pages() Frank Mehnert
2009-01-29 12:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-01-29 13:08 ` Frank Mehnert
2009-01-29 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 14:02 ` Frank Mehnert
2009-01-29 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 14:41 ` Frank Mehnert
2009-01-29 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 16:03 ` Frank Mehnert
2009-01-29 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 10:34 ` Frank Mehnert
2009-01-30 10:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 14:56 ` [PATCH] x86: add might_sleep() to do_page_fault() Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 14:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 15:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 15:03 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233232094.4495.45.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Frank.Mehnert@Sun.COM \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox