public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Thomas Pilarski <thomas.pi@arcor.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12562] New: High overhead while switching or synchronizing threads on different cores
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:57:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233302270.6061.9.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233237934.11129.183.camel@bugs-laptop>

On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 15:05 +0100, Thomas Pilarski wrote:
> > In short this program is carefully crafted to defeat all our affinity
> > tests - and I'm not sure what to do.
> 
> I am sorry, although it is not carefully crafted. The function random()
> is causing my problem. I currently have no real data, so I tried to make
> some random utilization and data.

Yeah, rather big difference, mega-contention vs zero-contention.

2.6.28.2, profile of ThreadSchedulingIssue 4 524288 8 200

vma              samples  %        app name                 symbol name
ffffffff80251efa 2574819  31.6774  vmlinux                  futex_wake
ffffffff80251a39 1367613  16.8255  vmlinux                  futex_wait
0000000000411790 815426   10.0320  ThreadSchedulingIssue    random
ffffffff8022b3b5 343692    4.2284  vmlinux                  task_rq_lock
0000000000404e30 299316    3.6824  ThreadSchedulingIssue    __lll_lock_wait_private
ffffffff8030d430 262906    3.2345  vmlinux                  copy_user_generic_string
ffffffff80462af2 235176    2.8933  vmlinux                  schedule
0000000000411b90 210984    2.5957  ThreadSchedulingIssue    random_r
ffffffff80251730 129376    1.5917  vmlinux                  hash_futex
ffffffff8020be10 123548    1.5200  vmlinux                  system_call
ffffffff8020a679 119398    1.4689  vmlinux                  __switch_to
ffffffff8022f49b 110068    1.3541  vmlinux                  try_to_wake_up
ffffffff8024c4d1 106352    1.3084  vmlinux                  sched_clock_cpu
ffffffff8020be20 102709    1.2636  vmlinux                  system_call_after_swapgs
ffffffff80229a2d 100614    1.2378  vmlinux                  update_curr
ffffffff80248309 86475     1.0639  vmlinux                  add_wait_queue
ffffffff80253149 85969     1.0577  vmlinux                  do_futex

Versus using myrand() free sample cruft generator from rand(3) manpage.  Poof.

vma      samples  %        app name                 symbol name
004002f4 979506   90.7113  ThreadSchedulingIssue    myrand
00400b00 53348     4.9405  ThreadSchedulingIssue    thread_consumer
00400c25 42710     3.9553  ThreadSchedulingIssue    thread_producer

One of those "don't _ever_ do that" things?

	-Mike



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-30  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-12562-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-01-28 20:56 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 12562] New: High overhead while switching or synchronizing threads on different cores Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 22:15   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-28 22:25   ` Thomas Pilarski
2009-01-29  9:07     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 10:12       ` Thomas Pilarski
2009-01-29 10:24         ` Thomas Pilarski
2009-01-29 10:31           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 11:37           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-29 14:05             ` Thomas Pilarski
2009-01-30  7:57               ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-02-02  7:43                 ` Thomas Pilarski
2009-02-02  8:19                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-02  8:33                     ` Thomas Pilarski
2009-02-02  8:52                       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-02  8:55                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-02 12:15                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-02 18:29                             ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-02-02 18:35                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-03  4:55                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-03  3:56                   ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1233302270.6061.9.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thomas.pi@arcor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox