From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Nathanael Hoyle <nhoyle@hoyletech.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority scheduling
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:31:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233311516.6280.4.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233310700.7816.7.camel@localhost>
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 05:18 -0500, Nathanael Hoyle wrote:
> Ok, I'm now running:
>
> Linux nightmare 2.6.28.2-nhoyle #1 SMP Fri Jan 30 04:50:03 EST 2009
> x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz GenuineIntel
> GNU/Linux
>
> Initial conclusion is that whatever defects were corrected (non
> SCHED_IDLE specific defects that is), the newer kernel version does the
> trick. Video playback is as smooth as ever when running foldingathome
> at simple nice 19 priority.
Good to hear, thanks for testing.
Peter, since 27 is a long term maintenance kernel, do you think 1af5f73
and 046e7f7 (at least) are 27.stable candidates?
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-30 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-30 5:49 scheduler nice 19 versus 'idle' behavior / static low-priority scheduling Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 6:16 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-30 6:40 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 7:21 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-30 7:59 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 8:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-30 8:55 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 9:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-30 22:12 ` Brian Rogers
2009-01-31 5:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-31 9:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-02 23:57 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-02-09 15:19 ` Brian Rogers
2009-02-09 15:51 ` Greg KH
2009-01-30 8:16 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 13:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-30 14:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-30 6:17 ` V.Radhakrishnan
2009-01-30 6:48 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 14:15 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-30 6:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-30 6:52 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 7:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-30 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 9:00 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 10:18 ` Nathanael Hoyle
2009-01-30 10:31 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2009-01-30 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-30 10:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-02-02 17:23 ` Lennart Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233311516.6280.4.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhoyle@hoyletech.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox