From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
To: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] create workqueue threads only when needed
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:40:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233589225.5903.107.camel@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c62985530902020651j59f3e041u2c80b96914b04765@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 15:51 +0100, Frédéric Weisbecker wrote:
> 2009/2/2 Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>:
> > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 01:17 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> >> All of the workqueues with 0 work inserted do nothing.
> >> For several reasons:
> >>
> >> _ Unneeded built drivers for my system that create workqueue(s) when they init
> >> _ Services which need their own workqueue, for several reasons, but who receive
> >> very rare jobs (often never)
> >> _ ...?
> >>
> >
> > Some of the workqueues you have on your system can be removed just by
> > tuning your kernel config. It's more desirable to be able to remove the
> > whole unused feature since that's all unused memory beyond just
> > thread ..
> >
> > Daniel
>
>
> Yes of course. I just think about the distros which enable a lot of
> options by default.
The problem is that your just removing the visible part of the memory
waste .. Even distros can/do use modules where some of these features
wouldn't get loaded.
I think it's a better policy to assume if a kernel has a feature enabled
that feature will get used, including the workqueue.
Daniel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-02 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 0:17 [RFC][PATCH] create workqueue threads only when needed Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 0:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-31 18:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-31 18:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-31 18:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-01 16:22 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 17:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 17:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 17:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 18:06 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 18:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 21:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 2:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-02 6:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 8:42 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 9:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:14 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 9:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-02 10:03 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 20:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 9:54 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 11:39 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 11:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-02 11:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-02 5:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-02 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:01 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 14:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <20090126162807.1131c777.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-27 1:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 8:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 3:07 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-01-27 8:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 14:49 ` Daniel Walker
2009-02-02 14:51 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-02 15:40 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233589225.5903.107.camel@desktop \
--to=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox