From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:03:46 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233623026.18767.148.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902030022.39396.rjw@sisk.pl>
> > (*) There are reasons to think that kmalloc/gfp should both silently
> > turn into GFP_NOIO always while the suspend process is started, but
> > that's somewhat a different subject. Rafael, did we ever act on that ?
> > It's an old discussion we had but I don't know if we actually
> > implemented anything.
>
> We have the ->prepare(), ->complete() callbacks that, among other things,
> can be used for allocating and freeing memory with GFP_KERNEL safely.
First, that's assuming drivers will be smart enough to figure that out.
They won't, believe me.
Then, as I said, this doesn't work in practice because there is no way
drivers and/or underlying subsystems will start "remembering" when they
are within a prepare/complete pair, and suddenly do allocations
differently. That's just going to break.
It's the allocator itself that -must- degrade to NOIO or ATOMIC, or
we'll just never get it right imho.
> Yes, that's possible in theory, never observed in practice from what I can
> tell.
Sure, neither did I, though I could manufacture a case. IE, you'll need
memory pressure at suspend time to start having problems with
allocations blocking on disk access. So I'm sure most of the time we
never hit it ... until we do one day and don't know why the whole system
deadlocked somewhere in suspend or resume.
Here we have a few low hanging fruits like that we know about, that can
make the difference between suspend/resume works always vs. it works
-most- of the time, unless I happened to have been under heavy memory
pressure while playing an MP3 on the train a 3rd day of the month....
IE. We don't want that rare case to break, because you can be sure that
that once out of 1000 times where it does is going to piss me off real
bad and probably just the day I typed something for 2h in a row without
saving etc...
> Hm, atomic allocations may cause other problems to happen (ie. fail easily).
That's true, but at the end of the day, if the choice is between
deadlock and failure, pick your medicine...
Maybe we could do it differently and have the allocators basically just
give up if they are going to trigger IOs or something but at the end of
the day, we need to make it robust, not just "will work most of the
time".
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200901261904.n0QJ4Q9c016709@hera.kernel.org>
2009-02-02 9:54 ` PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 20:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 20:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 21:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 21:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-02 20:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 21:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-02 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 22:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-02 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 23:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-02 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 0:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 0:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 1:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 1:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 1:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 3:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 3:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 4:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 6:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 22:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 23:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 16:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-03 0:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 0:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 3:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 3:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 4:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 4:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 9:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 17:04 ` Reworking suspend-resume sequence (was: Re: PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early) Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 18:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 18:32 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-03 18:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 19:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 19:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 21:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-04 10:07 ` Russell King
2009-02-03 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 19:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 21:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 22:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 23:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-04 0:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-04 8:02 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-04 23:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-05 8:19 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-05 19:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 23:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-04 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 21:02 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 17:53 ` PCI PM: Restore standard config registers of all devices early Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-02 22:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 23:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 0:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 0:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-03 1:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 5:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-03 12:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 23:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-03 22:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 23:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 22:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 21:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-02 22:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-02 22:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-02 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 0:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-03 0:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-10 20:25 ` Pavel Machek
2009-02-02 22:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 23:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-03 1:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2009-02-10 20:25 ` kmalloc during suspend, was " Pavel Machek
2009-02-02 17:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233623026.18767.148.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox